Yes it did but the apparent results are only short lived. We need to refocus our energy on being efficient and effective ecosystem managers

Thanks dear Joan Nyika

I do agree with you, dear Nur Çelik Efşan

Lock down has demonstrated the resilience of our ecosystems. The air and water became cleaner so fast, a speed that we cannot imagine to achieve with our intervention.

It demonstrates that nothing is late. If we allow rest, the planet can bounce back to normal, provided we don't delay it. We may need a longer lock down in terms of use of our resources, to reduce our consumption and forest depletion, to stop the further loss of biodiversity and degradation of our ecosystems.

Thanks for sharing, dear Geethanjali Mariaselvam

Yes, I think we can build a healthy ecosystem and don't think the time is delay also we must try to using all ways such as biofuel and solar ,water ,wind energy instead of goal and petrol fuel to clean the environment .

Thanks Dr. Israa Lazim

During the periods of lockdown COVID-19, many ecosystems got too much better health worldwide. In India, there are so many religious places, which is found near the river or in a forest so this lockdown played a role to stop all kinds of pollution. But the fact is that after complete a lockdown period all activity would again start.

Thanks Dr. Kamlesh Gadhvi

I do agree, Dr. Israa Lazim to reduce black smoke.

Ecosystem includes all living insects and animals, and non-living environment (river, soil, weather etc) of a particular area where plants and animals live together in their environment. Obviously lock down played a great role on recovering the ecosystem. Though it is too delay but possible to upgrade ecosystem. We all should perform our work considering environment. Otherwise nature will take revenge. This is high time to take necessary steps by different authorities.

Thanks for sharing dear Razu Ahmed

Yes, of course. The pressure and stress over the ecosystem was drastically reduced, an indication that man has been the major problem. The source of the trending covid-19 ravaging the world over was traced to man. Man has been impactful positively towards improved technology in medicine, engineering and agriculture, to meet his needs, he has adversely impacted on his environment while doing this which needs caution otherwise the environment will fight back, the result of which could be hazardous not to him alone but also to other living organisms.

Thanks for your kind sharing, Dr. Pius Adebayo Araoye

Yes, of course. The pressure/ stress over the ecosystem was drastically reduced, an indication that man has been the major problem. The source of the trending covid-19 ravaging the world over was traced to human error. Man has been impactful positively towards improved technology in medicine, engineering and agriculture, to meet his needs, he has adversely impacted on his environment while doing this which needs caution otherwise the environment will fight back, the result of which could be hazardous not to him alone but also to other living organisms.

Thanks Dr. Pius Adebayo Araoye

Most people realized by now that we can't keep polluting the environment. We deserved some lesson and somehow the virus taught us that lesson well.

Buen día estimado Muhammed Ashraful Alam indudablemente a nivel mundial se ha reportado mejoras en los ecosistemas y la disminución de los efectos negativos que emanan las grandes empresas.

Thanks for sharing and unluckily, I can share only in English @ dear Iraima Gutierrez

We it will be possible

Thanks dear Shno Mustafa Ali

I mean we hope it will be possible

I can guess your answer. Don't worry dear Shno Mustafa Ali

Follow

Yes, ,,,

Clean environment without carbondioxide

Yes definitely, the covid 19 lockdown have positively impacted our ecosystem, as human-induced activities which is the major cause of the alteration of our ecosystem have reduced drastically. It is important to note that our authorities have a major role to play in sustaining our environment by setting out rules and ensure it is strictly adhered. In so doing the depletion of ecosystem by man will be reduced or even completely eradicated.

Thanks Sura Aldewachi

Thanks Foad Alzoughool

Thanks for nice sharing dear Mary Funke Olabanji

just look at our ground zero observations

Thanks Dr. Abhijit Mitra

Uncertainty and risk is prevailing throughout the ecosystem. Till vaccination, as well as remedial measures, are known and clear, difficult to predict. But definitely lockdown, social distancing, and musk is essential components for live and livelihood to the entire ecosystem.

Thanks for sharing Kamal KUMAR Datta

Yes, the lockdown has definitely helped to get our ecosystem back, because the level of pollution impacted into the ecosystem by man has been reduced as a result of reduced activities. Industrial activities which is a major contributor has also reduced.

I think it is impossible to get our ecosystem back, the only thing we can do is to manage what we have right now because we can not stop industralization and civilization.

Thanks dear Itebimien Oghenovo

The ecosystem should be dealt with the development practices. Mostly developed and market-based well-structured economy dealt with market forces and the ecosystem works accordingly. In the Indian context, a lot of northeast hilly areas where the ecosystem was dealt with the surrounding people where social business is much more important than any other things not because markets are not developed but people want to live within their own ways. That's the uniqueness and integrated farming is the main way of their livelihood, monetization of the economy has not been influenced by the so-called " profit" concept.

Thanks for sharing dear Kamal KUMAR Datta

not really because this year we have consumed more one-use plastic and depended more of packaging services, so i think it's hurry to say that we have slowed down climate change just because de lock down

Thanks for sharing dear Jesús Reyes

Definitely it will change. Its direction, mode, and the process will be uncertain as it depends on longevity of the pandemic. How quickly it will be flattened depends on direction and movement

Thanks dear Kamal KUMAR Datta

Yes, lockdown helped the Indian continent and will defiantly help to bring back the ecosystem. Already steps have been taken towards that .

Thanks for sharing Kamal KUMAR Datta

A big NO in the Pastoral perspective in Uganda, East Africa. The reason is it was business as usual with Nomadic Pastoralists going about with their business in the rangelands and grazing areas in search of water and pasture, in addition to rangeland management practices such as bush burning taking place. This did not give change for the ecosystems rejuvenate in undisturbed sate.

Thanks Betty Flora Nakiru

Despite that lockdown reduces some of the environmental problems that our world faces, it comes as a result of a pandemic (the world was forced to do this). So there is no way in my opinion to think about lockdown as a good solution for making a healthy ecosystem.

Generally, I think that having a healthy ecosystem depends on making the environment a priority for all, and this will need so many years. But, unfortunately, the fact is that many countries focus on how to increase their economy without taking the environment and other organisms into consideration! If this does not change, having a healthy ecosystem will always remain a dream for us!

Thanks for sharing dear Bayan Khalaf and the question is not the implementation of lockdown for an unlimited time rather the immediate outcome of lockdown has been shared and we need to preserve our nature from further destruction. We need to think more to protect our ecosystem.

Yes. I share my opinion knowing that the idea beyond your question is how to solving this problem and not looking at "lockdown" as a solution.

Having a healthy ecosystem will occur just if the environment becomes one of the most important priorities for governments.

Thanks for your sharing dear Bayan Khalaf and we both the producer and consumer are responsible for today's climate change scenario. You can find it in RG too.

Who is responsible for climate change or global warming? Is it only for rich countries?

Many groups have been accused of being at blame for this ongoing lack of action, from fossil fuel companies and wealthy countries, to politicians, rich people and sometimes even all of us.Others may feel it’s not useful to blame anyone. Whether we label it blame or not, the question of who is responsible for the climate crisis is a necessary one. It will inevitably impact the solutions we propose to fix things.But it’s also important to acknowledge that allocating emissions to someone – the extractors of fossil fuels, the manufacturers who make products using them, the governments who regulate these products, the consumers who buy them – does not necessarily mean saying they are responsible for them.

June 19, BBC

Available at: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20200618-climate-change-who-is-to-blame-and-why-does-it-matter

I think it is too early to make conclusions on the effect of lockdown on the ecosystem

it's part of it

To certain extent YES. Magnitude and space depends on the model tested by different scholar and their assumptions

lockdown may help in reducing the air pollution in certain cities as the vehicular movement stopped. But in larger spectrum lockdown can not be a solution for the betterment of ecosystem.

no since now the number 1 contaminant are medical disposals, face masks above all