The fact is that, until the gravitation coefficient independence from the star age and size is proved by independent measurements, the notions on the so-called dark matter, dark energy, etc. are no more than the scientific fiction, because these notions result from the rates of recession of galaxies, which, in their turn, are estimated on the basis of the constancy of the gravitation coefficient.
This question hovers for twenty days, and nobody answered it. Such a result is predictable. Meanwhile, the Solar System gravitation coefficient is taken as a universal constant, and it is one of the parameters that led to the conclusions on the availability of dark matter, dark energy, and other miracles over the Universe. The many-decade searches of these surprising phenomena led to nothing. No gravitons are found in atomic nucleuses, and apparently they will be never found there. It is possible that gravitation is the function of the star/space system, and then it is logically to wait that gravitation can depend on the star age and size. This is one of the causes why the notions of the dark matter, dark energy, etc. are under question. Does it mean that the attempts to be beyond the Solar System scope in our calculations are premature? These doubts are all the more relevant because other assumptions, such as Eddington’s notions of stars as of the fusion reactors calculable on the basis of ideal-gas laws underlying the calculations of the galaxy rates, bear on nothing.
Dear Martin,
Thank you for your support. Of course, you are right. Indeed, I regret very much that I am the first who said loudly about this. I hope that the fact that I proposed new views on the Univese history and the processes and phenomena that proceed in it excuses me. I sincerely feel that I am guilty towards the researchers who advocate the widely distributed notions of the Universe, and I understand that they trust in the validity of these notions. However, each of us is the servant of the Science, and these are not empty words for me. I hope that my scientific activity proves these words. Indeed, I rased quite a number of wrong believes but I rased nothing without formation of new understandings instead of the rased ones.
Dear Martin,
I am acquainted with Prof. Josef Brestensky, Departement of math, physics, and informatics, cathedra of astronomy, physics of the Earth, and mereorology. He is of encyclopaedic knowledges. I think, his opinion on any subject is rather useful.
Regards.
Dear All,
I see three factors that force me to doubt in the constancy of the light speed and direction (I think that it is clear that the variations in the direction are equipollent to variations in the speed) over the Universe.
(1) The gravitation coefficient might be different in different stellar systems or, all the more, in different galaxies. It is observationally shown that light deviates in gravitation field (just such an observation was taken as a confirmation of the earlier Einstein’s theory). If the gravitation coefficient is different over the Universe and changes in an unknown manner, the light speed out of the Solar System is unpredictable.
(2) Even through the gravitation coefficient is the same over the Universe (I have grounds to think that this is improbable; see below), it is possible that light propagates, in preference, along the between-galaxy boundaries (between-galaxy space) where no gravitation exists and, thus, it can propagate in a straight line along great but limited distances and, when propagating through multi-galaxy distances, chooses the directions of minimum resistance; in this case, its direction is also unpredictable.
(3) In the 20th century, after development of the quantum field theory (1934), an opinion existed that gravitation is a property of each atom as such and that this property is caused by the existence of gravitons, i.e., massless spin-2 boson particles that represent carriers of this property, in each atomic nucleus. However, no gravitons were discovered within nuclei, in spite of their 80-year searches over the world. Eighty years is a rather long period, and, today, it is necessary to be rather obstinate optimists to wait the discovery of such particles. It must not be ruled out (although I do not undertake to state) that gravitation is an integral feature of the space/celestial-body system but not the feature of each atom and that this feature depends on the size and, may be, age of the star that forms the stellar system.
I wrote earlier about different other criticism relative to the present calculations of the masses and distances of the celestial bodies.
The PFO-CFO Hypothesis represents the answer to these doubts and criticism. It is available at my and Elena Kadyshevich's papers at ResearchGate.
Sincerely.
Victor.
- Badges
- Science topic