I have generated a DMT signal on AWG (tektronix 70002A) and then used it to modulate LED(the signal is DC-biased to have voltages above LED threshold).

The signal after photo detection is captured on oscilloscope along with the back to back signal from AWG (A direct coax connection between AWG and oscilloscope).

For back-to back connection, the Sampled data from oscilloscope (25000 sample points) is compared with the input DMT signal shape. It is observed that the input DMT signal can be reconstructed by using the samples between 15227 to 16384. Fig1. Thus the start and end points are identified within the above range.

But the signal after photo-detection (Fig2.) is totally unidentifiable for the corresponding start and end points. Will the aforementioned sample points are the start and end points for the detected signal? Does the delay due to optical and coaxial lengths create significant shift in the start and end points between the signals? Any better method to identify the start and end of the DMT signal?

Similar questions and discussions