For example in the paper De Jong, J. P., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Innovative work behavior: Measurement and validation. EIM Business and Policy Research, 8(1), 1-27,
Innovative output is a dimension of innovative work behavior. Could I use this separately in a survey?
Definitely, it could be isolated from the innovative work behaviour and further scrutinized as a separate dimension that you want to focus on. In doing so please find supporting literature on innovative output for you to rely on as theoretical underpinnings and guide. Guided by this , you can generate more aspects or elements to be featured in your survey. Most importantly all these will help you to seek information for your objectives of study and research questions. Do not lose focus on this. Good luck
Yes you can. All studies are different. So you can use any dimension or construct that is applicable to your study.
Yes, its possible. In our research papers we are often using a lot of combinations between variables. At this moment we are working at a survey, and the responses collected are resumed to a set of latent variables (constructs), obtained running an exploratory (EFA) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), part of them being used as dummy variables (control variables).
Can I use only one personality type as a moderator variable from the Big Five Inventory?
I only need to take openness to experience as my variable and is it okay to do so?
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Philosophy
- Philosophy Of Science
- Reasoning