Hello
I am working on social representations.
I am standing out that representations come from sensory process through exploring the world around. This sensory process is the interface between an "outer" and an "inner" world. I wonder how to relate Adams & al's dynamic model (1995) with the 4E cognition (embodied, embedded, enactive, and extended), supposing that representations are under homeorhesis consequently to the active interaction with the context.
I read that enactivism is bearly against representations, and I wondered if it is always the case in fact?Does enactivism reconsider memory as known (semantic, autobiographical, etc.)?
Do you have some cues about that?
As you see, I am a real beginner about the question, please excuse me.
Thanks
In my humbled opinion, social representations are not only subjective but sensorial, semantic, interactional processes of re-construction of the world around. These cultural processes are the symbolic interface ("alter") between a "subject" and an "object". So, I don't agree with your premise, I'm sorry.
See also the amazing book of Ivana Markova (2003) Dialogicality and Social Representations: The Dynamics of Mind.
Best regards.
I think you should above all consider the role of culture. Read Vygotsky and Bakhtin for a triangulation with Moscovici.
About inner/outer, see the work of Jaan Valsiner (his last books)
Totally agree with you Dany!
Moscovici made references to Vygotsky in his essay on "Marx, Vygotsky and social representations" and Ivana Markov a starts from Bakhtin in her book, already mentioned. Good suggestion.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Filing