Hi Keith

Thank you for your response and question. I suppose my affinity is for the scientific understanding of both chaos (scale of entropy in terms of effective complexity) and Mandelbrot's fractals.

Nassim Haramein has given us scientific proof of Einstein's unifying field theory. http://channel64.resonance.is/events/unified-field-theory-nassim-haramein-amsterdam-netherlands/ We now know that we are atomically entangled with each other and the universe. This moves us beyond the genetic argument as the most-reliable method for determining relationships, does it not?  

I suppose Haramein's proof inspired me most.

Superpatterns may even be in abundance. it depends on how and where one looks. Koch discussed superpatterns in nature in https://www.amazon.com/Power-Laws-Science-Success/dp/1857882490

Unless by "hologrpahic" you mean fields and forms of energy, which human eyes cannot generally see, superpatterns are more physically convincing than holographic illusions.

However,  what is being considered in this project is a pattern language, with which - in theory - a superpattern may be generated as an autonomous, generational organism. It is to bring forth some kind of intelligence that may be related to the beginnings of enticing consciousness to evolve within a deliberate system's boundary.

Further, the intent is to learn enough to hopefully enable an intelligent understanding of, what I refer to as, patterns of 1. In order to do this, a quantum methodology would be required. This project makes use of such a methodology that has been in R&D for nearly a quarter of a century.

When it is ready, (very soon), it would be applied to these and other research questions.     

I hope this answers your question.

If you do not mind, and at an appropriate time, your knowledge and experience may be most useful to serve as input into the methodology to see what could be illuminated and/or learned about the patterns you referred to.

Best regards

Rob