The intrinsic properties of elementary particles are determined at the time of their formation and carries on along its lifetime. If we need to alter the intrinsic behaviour of particle we would need to induce the initial stages of formation through accelerated collision of elementary particles which breaks the structural constraints to be redefined. Its similar to the study of stem cells were we need to create induced pluripotent stem cells through reverse engineering to alter its properties. 

For possible structural constraint of particles according to me, you can refer to attached publication:

Article Journey of the Universe from Birth to Rebirth with Insight i...

Article SPIRAL STRUCTURE OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES ANALOGOUS TO SEA SH...

Article A Spiral Structure for Elementary Particles

Dear Mark Rosen,

Can you state shortly, why the positive entity is not just a hole which we are used to in semi conductor physics to consider as a positively charged electric current conductor? Then your observation would "just" be a reversed Peltier effect.

PS: I have not read the paper you refer to, so my question may be answered in your paper - in which case I apologize for my quick comment.

Kind regards, Ole

Sorry for the delay in responding (I appreciate the questions and interest).

Remi Cornwall – Excellent question – I address conservation of charge in the paper (footnote on p. 2). The shorthand for the process of transforming an electron into a positron

e- + strong B or E field -> e+

which also requires electron confinement (to 1D or possibly 2D) was not meant to include all the physics that might be taking place. Any of the conservation laws have important qualifications for when they are valid.

Ole L. Trinhammer – Very Interesting Comment – Dirac considered the positron as a hole in an infinite negative energy sea of electrons. Many today do not believe in this physical construct (it does not explain the antiparticles of bosons). Just like the proton, I prefer to think of the positron as a physical particle.

Thanks for your ideas and feedback.

Mark,

 The brief introduction of the electron given below is necessary to conceptually explain how an electron can be converted to a positron.

 Please see Figure 2 in the 1st attachment, which is an excerpt from “New Physics Framework”; it gives a side view of an electron. The 2nd attachment, which is also excerpted, is a derivation of the electron.

 Per Figure 2, photon fibers combine to form a cylindrical B-field, which is an electron; thus, electrons are fields, not hard particles. The reason why fibers (photons) combine to form a cylindrical B-field is given by Maxwell’s equations; please see the 2nd attachment for the electron’s derivation. This tiny field has both particle and wave characteristics.

 The construction of other particles, such as protons and neutrons, consist of cylindrical B-fields also, similar to the electron. See Chapter 4 in the book for example. Thus, all matter is a compilation of cylindrical B-fields, which consist of oscillating and twirling photon fibers.

 The charge of an electron is negative because it’s circumferential B-field is left-handed, while that of the proton is right-handed. A neutron has no charge because it consists of a mixture of left-handed and right-handed twirling fibers.

 Since the electron only consists of and is a B-field, there is no electric field. The electric force is mobilized when a half B-field of an electron overlaps a half B-field of another electron, for example. At the overlap zone, a change in the intensity and direction of each B-field is felt by the other; thus, per Maxwell’s equations, an electric force is mobilized along the z-axis of each electron due to the change in “B”. The force is repulsive because the rotational directions of the half fields are opposite.

 When an electron is subject to an interaction that changes the rotational direction of its circumferential B-field from left-handed to right-handed, it becomes a positron. The referenced book provides insight as to why an electron/positron interaction results in annihilation, whereas an electron/proton interaction doesn’t. Please let me know if you have any comments.

 Regards,

Dam S. Correnti

Article UNVEILING of the ELECTRON (Post #1) [A Proposed Electron Structure]

Article DERIVATION of the ELECTRON (Post #2)

Reactions with non-conservation of electric charge can be proved exist as solutions of quantum super Yang-Mills PDEs.

In particular one can produce quantum reactions encoded by quantum Cheshire cat nonlinear propagators where a quantum electron is transformed in a naked electron, namely a quantum electron without quantum electric charge. (See http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.4856 )

Please forgive my silence -- I will be back in the discussion when I return at the end of next week. 

Thanks for your questions, comments and interest.

I am finally back – again thanks for all the interest shown and information shared.

Remi Cornwall – Thanks for your comments and taking the time to check one of the references. You may have a better understanding than me of Mohapatra’s PRL paper “Possible Nonconservation of Electric Charge” (extremely theoretical – not an easy paper to follow). At first, I felt I had found something that might give insight into the electron transformation process that I have hypothesized. Instead, I realized that it seemed to have little relevance. I am not sure what his 2 month estimation of the electron-positron oscillation implies.

The low energy process I envision in my paper requires very stringent conditions and has nothing to do with oscillations. It would strictly result in an electron becoming positively charged.

Dan S. Corrent – Thanks for sharing your work. I have downloaded your book (New Physics Framework). Being an experimental physicist, I am definitely hoping others will come up with any relevant theoretical ideas. I will definitely look over your book.

Agostino Prastaro – Thanks for the link to your paper (which I have downloaded). As an experimentalist, I am not too familiar with the area but will try to go through it. I have added your paper to my references concerning conservation of charge.