In this I mean other profound scholars that have defined hegemony as having the ability to represent those being dominated in a particular regime of representation.
Antonio Gramsci has dealt with the concept of hegemony in great detail.
Yeah, you need to read Gramsci. He does not specifically talk about "othering", but it is clear that the process of othering is fueled by hegemony.
Maybe this will also be helpful:
http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1343563?sid=21105228878671&uid=4&uid=2
he Hegemonic Form of Othering; Or, the Academic's Burden
Harold Fromm
Critical Inquiry
Vol. 13, No. 1 (Autumn, 1986), pp. 197-200
Mouffe and Laclau "Hegemony and socialist strategy"
Also, "Laclau and Mouffe: The radical democratic imaginary" -- good intro book
Also Bourdieu's symbolic violence is pretty much the same.
And Gayatri Spivak's "Can the Subaltern speak", also treats the same subject - the powerful classes ability to force its signs onto the dominated classes.
Dear Pushpa,
van dijk's dichotomous categorization of '' positive self presentation and negative other presentation and concepts self glorification , US vs THEM, are relevant to your study
moreover, my articles on Critical Discourse Analysis , Power specially '' Euphemization and Derogation shared on researchgate can provide you with theoretical and aspects of the phenomenon of hegemony.
good luck with your study
a.
- Badges
- Science method
- Similar topics
- Philosophy