I have developed my own trauma theory called The Steel Jacket: Antecedents of Trauma. Where my theory and her theory dovetail is the notion that one cannot totally subsume the trauma because there was no a priori knowledge that something so overwhelming was about to happen. Though bones may be broken, Caruth suggests the trauma is an affront to the mind. What my theory tries to resolve is the question of intuition. Can people somehow become so highly aware and attuned that they develop a critical insight that allows them to avert the unspeakable. For example, "just knowing" that they should delay going to the grocery store to avoid a horrific crash. My theory also explores time and timeline as an artificial construct.
Cathy Caruth's Trauma Theory is not a traditional trauma theory in the sense of a well-established and universally accepted framework. Instead, it represents a significant development in the field of trauma studies that challenges and expands upon traditional approaches.
Caruth's work has had a profound influence on how we understand trauma, particularly in the context of literature and cultural studies.
Here are some key points about Cathy Caruth's Trauma Theory:
Definition of Trauma: Caruth's work is known for its emphasis on the inherent incomprehensibility of trauma. She argues that trauma is a crisis of meaning that occurs when an individual experiences an overwhelming event that cannot be fully understood or integrated into their existing cognitive and emotional frameworks.
Delayed Responses: Caruth introduced the concept of "delayed responses" to trauma. She contends that traumatic events often result in delayed reactions, where individuals may not fully process the experience at the time it occurs. Instead, the impact of the trauma may surface later in unexpected ways.
Literary and Cultural Analysis: Caruth's Trauma Theory is particularly applied to the analysis of literature and cultural representations of trauma. She explores how literature and narratives can both convey and disrupt the conventional understanding of trauma, emphasizing the role of narrative in making traumatic experiences accessible.
Testimonies and Witnessing: Caruth also examines the role of testimony and witnessing in the aftermath of trauma. She argues that the act of bearing witness to trauma, through storytelling or other means, can be a way of attempting to make sense of and share the traumatic experience.
Interdisciplinary Approach: Caruth's work draws on psychoanalysis, literature, philosophy, and cultural studies to provide a multidisciplinary perspective on trauma. This interdisciplinary approach allows her to explore trauma in various contexts and from different angles.
Critique of Traditional Approaches: While not explicitly rejecting traditional trauma theories, Caruth's work challenges the assumption that trauma can be fully integrated or resolved through therapy or other psychological approaches. She suggests that the very nature of trauma resists complete understanding and resolution.
In summary, Cathy Caruth's Trauma Theory represents a departure from traditional trauma theories by emphasizing the complex, elusive, and delayed nature of trauma experiences.
Her work has had a significant impact on the study of trauma, especially within the fields of literature and cultural studies, and has encouraged scholars to approach trauma from a more interdisciplinary and nuanced perspective.