To have a better price than dimatix, you must fabricate an home made system.

For exemple you can build separatly all the modules...

have a look on this web site: http://www.microdrop.com/products.htmlBut it's a huge task!!!!

Me I work with CERADROP equipement, it cost more than dimatix but I make really nice devices. Have a look on this paper:

Epoxy Based Ink as Versatile Material for Inkjet-Printed Devices

Malo Robin, Wenlin Kuai, Maria Amela-Cortes, Stéphane Cordier, Yann Molard, Tayeb Mohammed-Brahim, Emmanuel Jacques, and Maxime Harnois

ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, Article ASAP

DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b06678

Publication Date (Web): September 15, 2015

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acsami.5b06678

Good luck

For a simple deposition, Epson (piezoelectric head) inkjet printers may be enough, but positioning accuracy and repeatability may be limited. For rapid circuit prototyping with conductive ink it was good enough as I saw it during IDTechEx Printed Electronics Berlin Show in 2013.

Alternately, you may look at the following machine from Methode Electronics: 

http://www.methode.com/Documents/TechnicalLibrary/NP-100_and_200_Datasheet.pdf

You should check Doctor blade printing. It costs around one lack. For more details, please go through our publication. 

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10854-014-2628-1

You can check out printers from Microfab, they have some desk-top based, low-budget types on sale, though the positioning accuracy is compensated. But I consider that the stability and repeatability of ink-jet printing organic materials can be quite a problem. And I would like to know if there's any solution to this. Anyone knows?

Waasdorp, R., van den Heuvel, O., Versluis, F., Hajee, B., & Ghatkesar, M. K. (2018). Accessing individual 75-micron diameter nozzles of a desktop inkjet printer to dispense picoliter droplets on demand. RSC advances, 8(27), 14765-14774.