Are many/most "interdisciplinary" studies BAD 'science'?
I think, perhaps, because their findings are not integratable except on basically the basis of intuition * (MUCH neuroscience/Psychology included) -- OFTEN no real connections (which are/can be clearly shown and true) can be made.
I also see this largely as a MAJOR crutch for Psychology (again: MUCH, much neuroscience included) and it's an impediment to science. All real science can be seen as connected (
Bad Science resultes from " neglecting individual differences".
Differences are due to differences, not necessarily because of being good or bad; or inferiority v superiority.
Comparing first v third person psychology, first person is the neglected one.
Let us think EXPONENTIALLY Geometric & Spatial.
Regards,
Mehri
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Biology