Dear Dariusz

I think it is fair to say that in most cases, current scientific understanding suggests that a simple combination of systematic global warming with an unchanged level of superimposed climate variability gives a reasonable approximation of where we are right now. This means that current heatwaves are being exacerbated by the warming we have accrued so far but cold extremes may be less extreme than they would otherwise have been.

There are however some examples where the variability may increase as well as the mean climate warming. For example heatwaves where the soil dries out can lead to extra amplification of temperature extremes. This paper is a good example of the evidence for that and the effects may get stronger in future:Article Climate extremes, land–climate feedbacks and land-use forcing at 1.5°C

Best regards

Adam

In my opinion, I would say what we are experiencing now is as a result of the earth, frankly trying to balance the perturbations currently existing in the earth's normal dynamics. You get sick to get rid of some unwanted substances in your body. The earth replicates this to get rid of the causes of unwanted perturbations (whether global warming or global cooling).

According to some of the reports, is true due to climate change Australia's temperature getting increasing

1. Meteorology department reported Australian temperature increases, drought and forest fire also.

2. Australia is the one of the leading place in Green house gas emission

3. Due to this, number of birds,fishes killed around Australian water bodies like darling lake

4. Algal bloom happend due to uneven temperature

We have taken responsibility like kyoto protocol and somany climate change projects like 2015 to 2020 emissions reductio n target in Australia. Now we have taken efforts to reduce some of key factors. So nature will answer this later

It can be said that the increase in global warming and its impact on the

weather anomalies will change. But reciprocally changing weather anomalies is also effective in global warming.

This is a very interesting discussion. I am so impressed by the comment made by Oluwafemi Adeyeri above. We could have made a very compelling conclusion unfortunately many studies relied on global warming apparently not so addressing the issue of global dimming. Last year, according to popular science (https://www.popsci.com/weird-weather-2018) is described as the year of weir weather meaning that weather is so varying year after year.

The Skeptical Science (https://www.skepticalscience.com/extreme-weather-global-warming.htm) gave a very good explanation which I think can be refereed to.

Thanks for the links. Exactly the point I was trying to make @Offoro.

Dear Offoro,

global dimming does not mean the same as global cooling! Global dimming can only compensate the effect of global warming to a certain degree. And, there are many papers dealing with global dimming ;-).

I am not sure if I get you correctly and if you belong to the climate skeptic community, but clearly, the webpage you refer to is not doubting the human made climate warming at all.

Dear Dariusz

I think it is fair to say that in most cases, current scientific understanding suggests that a simple combination of systematic global warming with an unchanged level of superimposed climate variability gives a reasonable approximation of where we are right now. This means that current heatwaves are being exacerbated by the warming we have accrued so far but cold extremes may be less extreme than they would otherwise have been.

There are however some examples where the variability may increase as well as the mean climate warming. For example heatwaves where the soil dries out can lead to extra amplification of temperature extremes. This paper is a good example of the evidence for that and the effects may get stronger in future:Article Climate extremes, land–climate feedbacks and land-use forcing at 1.5°C

Best regards

Adam

The increase in high-temperature related extremes and the decrease in low-temperature related extremes may have been at least partially caused by global warming, with some exaggerated by urbanization effect around the observational sites, and the change in other extremes is complicated with highly spatial and temporal heterogeneity. It is not accurate to mention that all extremes increase in frequency and intensity under the background of global warming. Please refer to an article on this issue published in 2011 in Climate Research special issue "Change in Climate Extreme over China" .

Article Global Warming Mitigation Through Carbon Sequestrations in t...

There have been many different weather anomalies in Europe in recent months. For example, in the south of Europe, for a few days at the beginning of May this year (2019) it was the coldest May for several decades. In addition, heavy rainfall and flooded some areas in the south of Europe.

There is a clear distinction between weather and climate. To define a climate, it is necessary thirty years or more of methodological observations of meteorological variables.

With respect to Climate, see the Figures of pages 14 and 15 in the link below, relative to the annual precipitation in Praia, Cape Verde, between the period 1886 to 2006.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262413798_O_PROJECTO_HIDRAULICA_RECURSOS_HIDRICOS_E_AMBIENTE_-_SANTIAGO_RESORT_E_A_GESTAO_SUSTENTAVEL_DOS_RECURSOS_HIDRICOS

According to World Meteorological Organization (2009): “Guidelines on

Analysis of extremes in a changing climate in support of informed decisions for adaptation”, it is written in Page 37, https://www.ecad.eu/documents/WCDMP_72_TD_1500_en_1.pdf

“The detection of changes in extremes is difficult because they are rare, and thus the amount of information available for analysis is limited. Nevertheless, failure to detect changes in extremes at a given location does not mean that the frequency or intensity of extremes is not changing.

(…)

It is important to note that large uncertainties and gaps in our knowledge of climate change

remain, particularly concerning extremes on regional and local scales.”

In the context of the above discussion, the following key questions arise:

Are climate variations studied in the field of palaeoclimatology, changes in the occurrence of weather anomalies, changes in the scale of occurring weather anomalies and their cyclicality in previous millennia and / or for the previous millions of years? Are such data in the field of paleoclimatology scientifically researched?

Please reply

Yes, they are a consequences of climate change and continues increase in temperatures

In my opinion, the current (late August and early September 2019) fires of the Amazon rainforest are largely a derivative of the global warming process, which is progressing faster and faster. A lot of data supports the thesis that the scale of these fires increased by about 80 percent. compared to the previous year may be to a large extent the result of the progressing global warming process, which process drains larger and larger land areas in various climate zones, melting glaciers, etc. The confirmation of this thesis is the fact that this year there are also numerous forest fires in other regions of the world, in other climatic zones, on other continents and in places where fires had not occurred on such a scale as today. For example, the current forest fires of the Siberian Tundra, tropical rainforest fires on the islands of Oceania, tropical forest fires in South Africa, etc. confirm this thesis that these are further negative effects of the ongoing global warming process.

Research conducted for many years by climatologists confirms that the global warming process is mainly caused by an increase in greenhouse gas emissions generated by the energy sector based on classic energy producing electricity from mineral combustion and the automotive industry also based on internal combustion engines. In connection with the above, it is necessary to increase expenditure in all countries on ecological reforms in order to implement the principles of sustainable ecological development according to the green economy philosophy.

Accordingly, the following key questions arise:

- Will the current negative effects of the global warming process, including, inter alia, more and more often occurring forest fires, force politicians and entrepreneurs to quickly carry out the necessary reforms in the energy sector and the car industry?

- Will humanity manage to restore balance in nature at least partly, or will it be possible to repair at least partly those damages that man has caused in natural environment over the last over 100 years?

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this topic?

Do you agree with me on the above matter?

Please reply

It is certainly the result of global warming

Interesting question.