One case out of hundred cases:

On built-in test reuse in object-oriented framework design article

The article does not exist on Google Scholar, but it is listed on ResearchGate.

[1]

Association for Computing Machinery

https://dl.acm.org › doi

On built-in test reuse in object-oriented framework design

By Y Wang · 2000 · Cited by 67 — On built-in test reuse in object-oriented framework design.

Refer to as “On built in.”

• Authors:

• Yingwu Wang

• Dilip Patel

• Graham King

• Ian Court

• Geoff Staples

• Margaret Ross

• Mohamad Fayad

Author's Info & Claims

ACM Computing Surveys, Volume 32Issue 1espp 7–eshttps://doi.org/10.1145/351936.351943

Published:01 March 2000 Publication History

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjur6K8jID_AhUhPUQIHWkqA0gQFnoECB0QAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fdl.acm.org%2Fdoi%2F10.1145%2F351936.351943&usg=AOvVaw1fHi8dEQuglc0WX7YY_YKe

[2]

ResearchGate:

On Built-in Test Reuse in Object-Oriented Framework Design

• March 2000

• ACM Computing Surveys 32(1 es):7-12

• DOI:

• 10.1145/351936.351943

• Source

• doi.acm.org

•

Research Interest Score

19.0

Citations

51

Recommendations

0

Reads

61

Please note:

I am listed as the last author, and I am, in fact, the third author. (Please refer to the article)

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjur6K8jID_AhUhPUQIHWkqA0gQFnoECBQQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F261708096_On_Built-in_Test_Reuse_in_Object-Oriented_Framework_Design&usg=AOvVaw3_8cGeiB4ogeJFoEHtCw8J

[3]

Semantic Scholar

54 Citations

Highly Influential Citations

2

Background Citations

16

Methods Citations

10

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjur6K8jID_AhUhPUQIHWkqA0gQFnoECBMQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.semanticscholar.org%2Fpaper%2FOn-built-in-test-reuse-in-object-oriented-framework-Wang-Patel%2Fa24ed1b8c194728a6977c1c00f424633e4964480&usg=AOvVaw07yF5-a2bspt9RNInel5WM

Summary:

Where

Citations

Number of Reads and download

Recommendations

ACM

67

1,681

2

RGs

51

61

0

Semantic Scholar

54

Not provided

2

Google Scholar

Not exist and I will be added today.

Finding #1: ResearchGate is the lowest in the citation (51), and ACM 67, and 16 citations are missing.

Finding #2: ResearchGate has 61 reads and ACM have 1,681 downloads, poorly affecting the research interest score.

Finding #3: ResearchGate has zero recommendations, while ACM has 2 Highly Influential Citations (Recommendations)

Finding #4: I am the third author and guest edited the entire theme issue on the ACM Computing Survey, one of twelve theme issues that I guest edited.

Finding #5: This article does not exist on Google Scholar; hundreds of my articles also need to be posted.

Finding #6: Frankly speaking, ResearchGate is harming my Scientific Reputation, and I don't know why? My citations are more than 10k.

Finding #7: ResearchGate citations do not increase at the same rate as Google Scholar

Google Scholar – Please see attachment.

1996 – 148

1997 – 212

…

2000 – 241

2001 – 315

2002 – 447

2003 – 527

You will notice drops in specific years because of Legal battles, Health, and Family Problem, from 2006 to and present. But I am still working very hard because I love what I do.

…

2019 – 114

2020 – 99

2021 – 75

2022 – 59

2023 – 45 and it will increase a lot by GOD'S WELL

I emailed ResearchGate several times, and they have yet to reply.