For the last three years I've been trying to find out as much as I could about architectural adaptations to better accommodate people on the autistic spectrum. I've learned a great deal from professionals in The Netherlands who were involved in designing and building treatment facilities. On the other hand there's a growing body of literature around this topic. Some of the most important articles are to be found on http://www.ud-da.eu/information_nav.htm, Mostafa, Humphreys, Whitehurst and Scott have made key-contributions, so have the British architect Beaver and Khare & Mullick who have, like Mostafa proposed a matrix of design principles. Hendriksen & Kaup (2009) (http://www.kon.org/urc/v9/henriksen.html) constructed matrixes of classroom design, drawing from literature which was partly new to me. Until very recently my impression was very little research had been done. “Advancing Full Spectrum Housing: Design for Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders” by Sherry Ahrentzen and Kim Steele, however made me doubt this. (Their work is part of a larger project by the Urban Land Institute Arizona, Southwest Autism Research & Resource Center and Arizona State University.)

Now I started a quest for effect research, testing one or more design principles which were published over the past 6 or 7 years. Many seem to work in practice, but I’ve not come across any rigorous tests [with the possible exception of Mostafa’s (2008) classroom-measures where the number of children was inversely related to their extremely impressive effects.]

The context may be education with which most articles seem concerned, but can also be (semi) independent living (Ahrentzen & Steele) or any other, including treatment facilities of any degree of ‘intensity’.

Ultimately I’ve come to believe there’s a limited number of motives behind design recommendations. My hypothesis is there are basically three: 1) the senses, 2) specific autistic phenomena such as (most notably) central coherence and 3) social difficulties which can partly be remedied through design.

The main principle behind all this is basically the same as is behind many other measures around people with ASD: they can learn to a certain extent to adapt to the 'neurotypical world', beyond which the environment has to adapt to them. ‘The environment’ is usually taken to mean the social environment but should include the physical and the built environment as well. My working hypothesis is that physical measures can be just as effective as most therapeutic ones and combinations of the two even more.

Similar questions and discussions