Imaginary motion is often noticeable while half-asleep, or sleep deprived, or under the influence.

However, most vision-systems (cameras and video-recorders) and distance-measurements are generally thrown away if they produce any level of distortion.

If the images were consistently representative with that of repeatable mind-states, would there be any regard for the feasibility of understanding? Perhaps use-case scenarios might be legally-inclined for the case of a jury or a witness, and the differences between minds for matters of opinion / fact or otherwise, perhaps even the detection of lies.

Seeing as it has been shown that imperfection in perception is the default, perhaps also it might by of interest for the owners and producers of catamaran's to know whether or not they themselves are at fault.