A possible answer in A. Tugui, D. Danciulescu, M.-S. Subtirelu (2019, The Biological as a Double Limit for Artificial Intelligence: Review and Futuristic Debate. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS COMMUNICATIONS & CONTROL, 14(2), 253-271, April 2019 https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2019.2.3536).
http://univagora.ro/jour/index.php/ijccc/article/view/3536/pdf
Is it necessary and appropriate to plan the design of such AI that go beyond the human being?
"The usefulness of the descriptive truism formulated in the previous question, rounded by the obvious conclusion that we have many limitations, helps us to clearly understand another aspect: Someone (from the creationist perspective) or Something (from the evolutionary perspective) has contributed to our development as a species. Are we able to compete with the Creator or the Millennia-long evolutionary process in our attempt to design AIs? Should we attempt to do so? And if yes, are we firmly convinced that we will succeed? And if we succeed, is it prudent for the human species that these AIs be superior to us in terms of intelligence? It is obvious that the human has been overcome in many areas by technology, as far as efficiency is concerned. Is it necessary and opportune that we be overcome by technology and from intelligence perspective? The positive answer to such a question, correlated with the ethical limitation regarding the exploitation of these AI as highlighted by Abrahams, should encourage a serious reflection on the future sharing of the exploited and exploiter roles."
-----
Abrahams, P.W. (1997). The World Without Work, In P. Denning, R. Metcalfe, R. (Eds.), Beyond calculation: The next fifty years of computing, Santa Clara, CA: Springer-Verlag Telos,
135-147, 1997.
That is the aim of AI called superhuman but as long as it is created by humans it is subject to humans no matter how AI performs
That has a dual plot, where the main question is the ethics. So if the utility of AI was the technical evolution of mankind, or such things, may be considered necessary and appropriate. Otherwise, it's not. We can expand those arguments for a cyborg conception, with a AI controlled prosthesis.
"... that go beyond the human being." Interesting subject.
This assertion should be rephrased into:
...that go beyond the human being as we know it today.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Computer Science and Engineering
- Artificial Intelligence