Maybe this new generation of astronomical instruments has just reached us

I think the geometry of the Universe is such that there are no "far corners" to be reached. Logically the Universe can have no "edges" or "boundaries" because it would imply that there would be something on the other side and what could be "on the other side" except more Universe. Because of the finite velocity of light we can only peer back in a time a finite distance into a Universe that has no "end".

We call our own home galaxy the Milky Way Galaxy; the Andromeda Galaxy is a neighboring galaxy some two million lightyears distant from our galaxy. Constellations are patterns and groupings of stars in the night sky as seen by human beings on the surface of the Earth. Unlike galaxies constellations have no physical meaning but are convenient divisions of the sky in which to locate celestial objects, like galaxies, that do have physical significance.

As time passes and technology advances we surely will learn much more about our Universe than we know today but there probably is a limit to how much we can ever know. That will be a very interesting moment when it arrives and the wise proclaim "We can know no more!" The joy of it all will lie in the journey and the surprises that we will find along the way.

Undoubtedly no,The univers has horizons but not broders.It is expanding at an ever incresing rate.This expansion is not accompanied by any development.

The above question inspired me to the following considerations: Can other forms of life occur on other exoplanets? Research is currently underway to answer what conditions are needed to create life in a situation of a different chemical composition that is potentially present in many exoplanets, i.e. planets in other planetary systems, in other constellations of our Andromeda Galaxy or in other galaxies. Perhaps for the emergence of life it is necessary to have on the given planet, far from the Sun, many various other determinants, such as the occurrence of water and atmosphere with a specific chemical composition. Therefore, perhaps life exists in the Universe on other exoplanets very rarely. Theories on this topic among astronomers have changed significantly over the last several decades. In the 1960s, most scientists claimed that in the entire Universe life was created only once, ie on Earth. Some scientists then pointed to the groundlessness of searching for intelligent life outside Earth. It was claimed because it was thought that the origin of life on Earth is a kind of unique case of chemical reactions that took place on Earth. Chemical reactions with such a low probability that one should exclude the possibility of repeating such a large coincidence of the necessary determinants of the origin of life. However, even then, in terms of the number of other planetary systems found in other constellations, in other galaxies, in the number of other exoplanets, a certain distance from their suns, these estimates were mistaken. The emergence of better telescopes generated a change in these estimates. This change consisted in thousands of galaxies being turned into billions of galaxies. Similar to the number of planets in these galaxies. Therefore, even if we take into account the statistics and the question of selecting random determinants determining the emergence of life on other exoplanets, if these potential exoplanets with favorable conditions for the emergence of life is not hundreds, thousands but millions, then the probability is much greater. In the 1970s, the researcher Francis Crick wrote that "Nowadays the emergence of life seems almost a miracle, because for it to exist, a lot of conditions must be met". Similarly, Jacques Monod wrote in a book published in 1970: "Case and necessity" wrote: "People finally know that they are lonely in the indifferent space of the Universe, in which they appeared by pure chance". (continued in the comments). In view of the above, the current question is: Can other forms of life occur on other exoplanets? Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

The eminent scientist Paul Davies claims that currently many scientists are in favor of completely different theories suggesting a large probability of the fact that life in the Universe was created in many places, on various exoplanets, ie many times.

In addition, many eminent scientists claim that various forms of life occur in various places in the Universe.

Some of the eminent researchers suggest that on some exoplanets, where there are various forms of life, there are also intelligent life forms.

Biologist Christian de Duve went further in this trend of scientific theory because he described life as a "cosmic imperative".

However, modern knowledge in the creation of life on Earth has changed little over the years, since the study of the evolution of life on Earth began to be studied.

Well, we know about the transition from inanimate to life-filled forms on the ground, almost as much as Charles Darwin, who wrote over 100 years ago: "Now thinking about the creation of life is just as silly as considering the origin of matter."

In the field of astronomical instrument technology, a lot of progress has been made over the past few decades.

Recent discoveries of hundreds of exoplanets are an important factor determining the validity of the search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI - search for extraterrestrial intelligence).

According to current estimates, there may be billions of exoplanets in our own Andromeda Galaxy in the form of planets similar in many respects to Earth.

There is probably a lot of exoplanets that can be colonized.

However, we still do not know the details of the complex process that led to the creation of life on Earth.

We do not know all aspects of the process that converts a mixture of organic or inorganic chemicals into the first life forms into a living cell.

According to Paul Davies, it is not possible to precisely calculate the probability with which life could be created on different exoplanets.

Carl Sagan once remarked that the birth of life can not be so difficult, because then it would not appear on Earth almost immediately after the conditions became appropriate.

Paul Davies also points out that the universal argument is the magnitude of the Universe: if it is so big, then life must appear somewhere. But what does this statement mean? By limiting ourselves to the observable part of the Universe, we will probably find in it 1023 planets. Yes, it is actually a large number. However, it is reduced by the tiny probability of even simple organic molecules being created by pure chance. If the path from chemistry to biology is long and complicated, it may turn out that life occurs less often than on one trillion trillion of planets.

The conviction that life is widespread is based on the silent assumption that biological evolution processes are not the result of accidental chemical reactions, but they contain a specific purpose.

This purpose lies in the development of targeted and increasingly complex self-organization.

The increasingly complex organized structures determine the superiority of the living forms over the inanimate.

Sometimes this is referred to as a kind of unwritten law of life or the purposefulness of creating and developing life with the possible creation of an intelligent being.

However, for now, such theories may arise and will remain only theories, because man has not yet developed research instruments, with the help of which such theories and research thesis could be verified.

Scientist Sagan claimed that life appears frequently in the Universe. He also claimed that perhaps life on Earth arose many times. Therefore, if there were many beginnings of life on Earth, then also in currently functioning ecosystems there should be organisms with a different origin of life.

If such a theory were to turn out to be true, it would mean that in some ecosystems on Earth there are life forms that have arisen in completely different origins of their initial life forms and create a biosphere within one ecosystem.

On the other hand, they have recently been discovered in meteorites that are burning fossils of something that may resemble bacteria.

So if the bacteria could bring life to Earth before billions of years, it would be the first significant evidence of the possibility of life on other exoplanets.

Moreover, it is interesting that in this period of the last few decades, ie when significant changes occurred in the astronomers' theories and in the answer to the question about the existence of other forms of life in the Universe, at the same time in the cinematography the presentation of these alternative alternatives has also changed. worlds, other life forms that may exist on other exoplanets.

It is from the 70s of the twentieth century that the form and content of the depicted cosmos and possible aliens in space in the subsequent films are changing.

The first of the films in which this issue was taken seriously is the movie "2001. Odyssey Space" directed by Stanley Kubrick.

The subject concerned space travel and not discovered, completely different forms of life, however, this film opened a new era in cinematography.

In the following years, more and more sci-fi movies were being made, in which the plot was somewhere in space with the participation of people meeting or even cooperating with other humanlike intelligent beings.

In one of these films, this subject was taken in the convention of typical entertainment as in the films from the saga "Star Trek" and "Star Wars" and in other films in conventions or catastrophic (hostile to Earth humans intelligent creatures from other exoplanets) or in a convention typical paranova , in which people in precisely planned space missions go to Mars (as in the films: "Mission to Mars", "Red Planet", "Martian", ...) or go outside the Solar System to colonize another exoplanet (film "Passenger").

Therefore, the convergence and correlation in the theories of scientists regarding the scale and the probability of other forms of life on other exoplanets and the observed changes in the presentation of the issues of space and life in the cosmos in the cinematography over the last few decades is an interesting one.

In view of the above, the current question is: Can other forms of life occur on other exoplanets?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

Dear Friends and Colleagues of RG

In the context of the above considerations, the following question is also current:

Will the technological development allow us to look at the surface of the nearest exoplanets in the 21st century? Will as a result of the continuation of technological progress in the twenty-first century more perfect telescopes or other astronomical instruments that will allow to know what is on the surface of the nearest exoplanets, and above all the guilty star systems similar to the Earth exoplanets located in other planetary systems circulating around other suns?

Please reply

Best wishes

In view of the above, it is also important to include in the above discussion also the following issue:

How is the unlimitedness of the Universe explained now?

In many cosmological theories, astronomers try to explain the essence of the unlimitedness of the Universe. But how can this unlimitedness be presented and defined in the most concise and clear way possible?

What can be compared to the unlimitedness of the Universe?

Or maybe the essence of the problem goes beyond the scientific definition of the concept of the unlimitedness of the Universe?

The problem may be the understanding of this unlimitedness of the Universe by man, because everything that surrounds man in everyday life on Earth is limited.Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?

In view of the above, I am asking you the following question:

How is the unlimitedness of the Universe explained now?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Best wishes

Dear Stefanie McKenzie, Dwight Hoxie, Rafah Rasheed Ismail, Aleš Kralj, Abdulfatah Abdu Yusuf, Hello everyone, thank you for participating in the discussion. Thank you very much for your inspiring, interesting and highly substantive answer.

Thank you very much and best regards, Have a nice day,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Hello Dear Everyone, In the context of the above discussion, I would like to ask: Is Industry 4.0 in connection with the advances in space and information technologies, whether in the 21st century man will find out whether there are other advanced intelligent life forms and other civilizations somewhere in the Universe?

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Taking into account the enormous space distances, a man will probably never be able to reach the farthest corners of the Universe with any technical instruments. Rather, we will never look into the farthest corners. So only cosmological theories can be helpful in building models that describe the far corners of the Universe, distant galaxies that we are unable to peek into with any optical or other instruments.

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

The idea that the universe has a limit is hard to understand. If there is an end to the universe what is on the other side of that end point?

Dear Rick Manner,

You have raised an important point by asking: If there is an end of the universe, what is on the other side of that end point? Yes. But if the universe is unlimited, how can the infinity of the universe be expressed beyond what we know? The whole universe as we know it is described in a certain way, and if there is something else outside the known universe, how is it defined, i.e. something that is outside the known universe? Is it infinite nothingness or alternative universes?

What do you think about it?

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Dariusz Prokopowicz I don't believe it is infinite nothingness. Probably a lot more stars, planets, asteroids, comets etc. like we have already seen and some more like something we have never seen. Maybe even a bunch of stuff that we could not possibly imagine.

Dear Rick Manner,

Thank you for your answer. Yes, it is difficult to believe in the infinite, endless nothingness beyond the universe we know. It is easier to accept, to imagine that there is something else beyond the universe we know.

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Dear Dariusz Prokopowicz ,

In the nearest future we will not be able to answer

who is right :-)

Dear Boris Michailovich Menin,

Yes, that's right. Many more years of research are needed to answer these kinds of questions.

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Dear Alaa Ali Alanbaky

Thank you for your answer.

Greetings,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Some of the most newly detected objects may be over 13 billion light years away, as derived from a standard model of the Universe. However, a powerful new generation of telescopes, like the James Webb Space Telescope, will be needed to confirm the suspected distances of these objects. https://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/features/cosmic/farthest_info.html

Kindly check https://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/14/science/space/the-telescope-of-the-2030s.amp.html

Also check https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/four-new-giant-telescopes-are-about-to-rock-astronomy

Dear Chinaza Godswill Awuchi,

Exactly. 13 billion light years. It is hard to imagine such huge cosmic distances. So, successively technological progress is being made in the field of building more and more perfect telescopes thanks to which we can look into more and more distant corners of the Universe. Thank you for providing links to interesting publications on this subject.

Regards, Stay healthy!

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Alien hunters detect mystery signal coming from the closest star system

https://www.livescience.com/proxima-centauri-mystery-radio-beam.html

Dear Boris Michailovich Menin,

A very interesting point. Thank you for this information suggesting that after many years of searching for other civilizations in the Universe, listening to thousands of planetary systems, perhaps we finally managed to hear certain sounds from distant exoplanets that could confirm the existence of other intelligent beings and other civilizations in the universe.

Regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Dear Dariusz Prokopowicz ,

You are a dreamer.

I am too!

But, Every scientist is a hostage of his own limited knowledge, life experience and can have great intuition :-)

Based on my own developed theory (information method - Article The Problem of Identifying Possible Signals of Extra-Terrest...

At this moment, the chances of finding an extraterrestrial civilization using the available methods and tools are close to zero !!! ???

Invested billions dollars will not help us!

Hehe... remember that the aliens may also find us...(!) ;-)

And with time we human beings may also discover and invent something which may totally change our view on the universe...(!) :-)

Dear Bjørn Petter Jelle ,

Dreamers of all countries unite!

Hehe, yes, and if (when?) that happens I really hope it will be like a dream and not like a nightmare...(!) ;-)

Dear Bjørn Petter Jelle and Dariusz Prokopowicz ,

Believe or not believe???

The Milky Way is probably full of dead civilizations

A Statistical Estimation of the Occurrence of Extraterrestrial Intelligence in the Milky Way Galaxy

Preprint A Statistical Estimation of the Occurrence of Extraterrestri...

Alien civilizations discovered in the Milky Way

Scientists at the California Institute of Technology, NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and Santiago High School have identified the most likely habitat for alien civilizations in the Milky Way. The researchers took into account such a factor as the self-destruction of intelligent beings. This is reported in an article published at arXiv.org.

To assess the prevalence and age of alien civilizations, experts used a galactic simulation model, which takes into account the probability of abiogenesis (the emergence of living nature from inanimate), the rate of evolutionary changes, and the likelihood of the death of a civilization. It turned out that the last parameter has the greatest impact on the number of intelligent civilizations and their age.

According to the simulation results, the largest number of possible alien civilizations inhabits the ring region located four thousand parsecs (one parsec equals 3.2 light years) from the center of the Milky Way.

At the same time, more and more civilizations disappear over time, but the inner regions of the Milky Way remain the most densely populated. In addition, most intelligent life forms are young, making them difficult to detect. The distance from the center of the galaxy to the Sun is 8.5 thousand parsecs.

The Milky way problem is so far from us.

BUT: COVID-19 will be with us many years !! look below.

Pfizer vaccine maker: COVID-19 with us for 10 years

The COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic will rage globally for another 10 years.

This prediction was made by the creator of the world's first approved vaccine, executive director of the German company BioNTech Ugur Shahin.

About 500 thousand doses of the drug for coronavirus have already been delivered to the UK, where a new strain of COVID-19 has been identified. Within a few weeks, the vaccine is likely to be approved in several other countries.

"The virus will stay with us for the next 10 years. We need to get used to the fact that there will be more outbreaks," he warned.

According to Shahin's forecast, the "new normal situation" will not mean that countries should be quarantined. He also warned that this winter it will not be possible to influence the number of infected people, but every effort must be made to change the situation for the better next winter.

"If the virus starts spreading more intensively, we may need a higher vaccine intake to get life back to normal," he stressed, referring to the new COVID-19 strain identified in Britain.

Shahin added that it will take another two weeks to see if the vaccine can cope with the mutated form of the coronavirus.

Yes, I think the research still continues to get success in the unleashed facts of the universe.

Dear Boris Michailovich Menin,

That's right. I am a dreamer in this type of scientific problem, in terms of the possibility of creating new technological solutions and scientific discoveries, thanks to which the key problems of the development of civilization will be solved and in terms of the possibility of space exploration.

Regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Dear Tanvir Singh,

Yes, I think so too. The incessant technological progress allows to reach remotely (eg through more and more perfect telescopes) to ever farthest corners of the Universe.

Stay healthy! Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

SETI: new signal excites alien hunters – here’s how we could find out if it’s real

https://theconversation.com/seti-new-signal-excites-alien-hunters-heres-how-we-could-find-out-if-its-real-152498

The US$100m (£70m) Breakthrough Listen Initiative, founded by Russian billionaire, technology and science investor Yuri Milner and his wife Julia, has identified a mysterious radio signal that seems to come from the nearest star to the Sun – Proxima Centauri. This has generated a flood of excitement in the press and among scientists themselves. The discovery, which was reported by the Guardian but has yet to be published in a scientific journal, may be the search for extraterrestrial intelligence’s (SETI) first bona fide candidate signal. It has been dubbed Breakthrough Listen Candidate 1 or simply BLC-1.

6.1.2021

Dariusz Prokopowicz wrote:

"Yes, I think so too. The incessant technological progress allows to reach remotely (eg through more and more perfect telescopes) to ever farthest corners of the Universe."

I completely agree with Dariusz!

Especially, as soon as my photon-electron telescope is realized

it will be possible to look inside the eye of a monkey at the event horizon

of the black hole of our Milky Way.

More at:

https://www.lulu.com/shop/ilija-barukcic/photon-electron-telescope/ebook/product-1k8pmnyp.html?page=1&pageSize=4

Best

Ilija Barukčić

Dear Boris Michailovich Menin,

Thank you very much for the link to the SETI program sent.

Regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Dear Ilija Barukčić,

Thank you for your speech. I am glad that we have the same opinion on this issue. Congratulations on building a photon-electron telescope that will allow you to look inside the eye of a monkey at the event horizon of the black hole of our Milky Way.

Thank you for the link given to the description of your photon-electron telescope. I am glad that thanks to such inventions and technological advances as your photon-electron telescope, you can reach more and more distant corners of the universe.

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Planets with many neighbors may be the best places to look for life Single exoplanets with wild orbits hint at a chaotic past

If you’re looking for life beyond the solar system, there’s strength in numbers.

A new study suggests that systems with multiple planets tend to have rounder orbits than those with just one, indicating a calmer family history. Only child systems and planets with more erratic paths hint at past planetary sibling clashes violent enough to knock orbits askew, or even lead to banishment. A long-lasting abundance of sibling planets might therefore have protected Earth from destructive chaos, and may be part of what made life on Earth possible.

Is there something other than the Earth’s size and position around the star that is necessary in order for life to develop?.

Most of the 4,000-plus exoplanets discovered to date have elongated, or eccentric, orbits. That marks a striking difference from the neat, circular orbits of the planets in our solar system. Rather than being an oddity, those round orbits are actually perfectly normal — for a system with so many planets packed together.

Orbital eccentricity–multiplicity correlation for planetary systems and comparison to the Solar system

Nanna Bach-Møller, Uffe G Jørgensen Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 500, Issue 1, January 2021, Pages 1313–1322

Dear Boris Michailovich Menin,

Thank you very much for your valuable substantive contribution to our discussion. You added interesting data about the positive marking and confirmation of the thesis about the possible existence of life forms in many other planetary systems outside our solar system.

Regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Dear Dariusz Prokopowicz ,

It is additional source for thinking:

Three Ways to the Moon

In March 2019, Vice President Mike Pence instructed NASA to do something rarely seen in space projects: move up a schedule. Speaking at a meeting of the National Space Council, Pence noted that NASA’s plans for returning humans to the moon called for a landing in 2028. “That’s just not good enough. We’re better than that,” he said. Instead, he announced that the new goal was to land humans on the moon by 2024. (attached)

Dear Boris Michailovich Menin,

Thank you very much for the publication sent on the issues discussed in this discussion.

Regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

This has already been done thousands of years ago. It would be more accurate to ask when the descendants of the ignorant and barbarians, i.e. we, will learn about this

I think the universe has no farthest corners. It is limitless or endless or upto infinity. Suppose if there is farthest corner...then what after that..again there will be universe. So we can say that with progressive improvement of astronomical instruments we will be able to see further..but not till the end as there is no end.

And as we human beings want to climb the next hill and mountain to see what's on the other side, we also want to go beyond and beyond that again in the universe. :-)

Interesting paper

https://www.sciencenews.org/article/nasa-venus-europa-landing-terrain-future-spacecraft

How future spacecraft might handle tricky landings on Venus or Europa

Scientists are getting inventive with ways to touch down on these worlds, where landers will face obstacles not seen elsewhere in the solar system.

Lisa Grossman

The best way to know a world is to touch it. Scientists have observed the planets and moons in our solar system for centuries, and have flown spacecraft past the orbs for decades. But to really understand these worlds, researchers need to get their hands dirty — or at least a spacecraft’s landing pads.

Since the dawn of the space age, Mars and the moon have gotten almost all the lander love. Only a handful of spacecraft have landed on Venus, our other nearest neighbor world, and none have touched down on Europa, an icy moon of Jupiter thought to be one of the best places in the solar system to look for present-day life (SN: 5/2/14).

Researchers are working to change that. In several talks at the virtual American Geophysical Union meeting that ran from December 1 to December 17, planetary scientists and engineers discussed new tricks that hypothetical future spacecraft may need to land on unfamiliar terrain on Venus and Europa. The missions are still in a design phase and are not on NASA’s launch schedule, but scientists want to be prepared.

Dear Bjørn Petter Jelle,

Yes, this is our human nature. We would like to know other worlds, other planets, other planetary systems, etc. Our quality of need to know is a factor of progress. However, it is rather unlikely that we will have time to build spacecraft that will allow us to go beyond our solar system.

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Who knows the future? If the human race survives and manages to develop our scientific and technological know-how throughout the years... in 1000 years... 10 000 years... 100 000 years... what will we be able to accomplish during all these years...?

Beyond our own solar system yes... in fact we have already just barely gone beyond our own solar system... with the unmanned Voyager 1 spacecraft so far away from Earth... and still so close to Earth as seen from the perspective of the vast universe... with also Voyager 2, Pioneer 10 and Pioneer 11 following and heading towards outer space... all these also unmanned... and one-way travels... when will the first human being walk on Mars and other planets and later on embark on a journey outside our own solar system?

I wish I had a time machine being able to travel both back and forth in time with a return ticket...(!) :-)

Rumbles on Mars Raise Hopes of Underground Magma Flows

Small and cold, Mars has long been considered a dead planet. But a series of recent discoveries has forced scientists to rethink how recently its insides stopped churning — if they ever stopped at all.

https://www.quantamagazine.org/mars-rumbles-raise-hopes-of-underground-magma-flows-20210201/?utm_source=Quanta+Magazine&utm_campaign=5345a9b24e-RSS_Daily_Physics&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_f0cb61321c-5345a9b24e-389723505&mc_cid=5345a9b24e&mc_eid=aed3226bfd

NASA’s InSight lander, which has been peeking inside Mars for two years now, has picked up on some curious seismic signals emanating from one such site of youthful volcanism. The results, which were presented at a conference in December, are not definitive. But they suggest that InSight could be hearing the sounds of convulsing magma — the drumbeat of volcanic warfare presumed to have fallen silent eons ago.

“It is a very exciting finding and, if confirmed, suggests that Mars could enter the pantheon of currently volcanically active worlds within our solar system,” said Christopher Hamilton, a planetary scientist at the University of Arizona.

If future data and analyses establish that magma does exist, that would be a revolutionary reveal. It would be solid evidence in support of a suspicion that scientists have harbored for some time now: Rocky worlds that look volcanically dead aren’t, said Paul Byrne, a planetary scientist at North Carolina State University. They are alive — or, to put it another way, “these worlds are just dying very slowly.”

Where no one has seen before

IEEE Spectrum January 2021 (attached) p. 30 - 31 (32-33)

The James Webb Space Telescope will let us see back almost to the big bang!!!

Yes, thanks to the improvement of the technique of building more and more perfect telescopes, multi-criteria analysis of photography, listening to the sounds of the cosmos, etc., man can reach more and more distant corners of the universe.

Regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Three countries are due to reach Mars in the next two weeks

A Martian marathon with the UAE, China, and NASA

https://www.theverge.com/2021/2/5/22266752/uae-china-nasa-mars-missions

A small fleet of spacecraft from the United Arab Emirates, China, and the United States will reach Mars this month after launching from Earth last year. The march to the Red Planet marks a marathon of firsts: it’s the UAE’s first foray into deep space, China’s first independent attempt to land on Mars, and NASA’s first shot at deploying a Martian helicopter.

The rare convoy of Mars-bound spacecraft launched off Earth in a slim, roughly two-month window last summer when Earth and Mars lined up just right in their orbits around the Sun. This planetary alignment only happens once every two years, and three countries took advantage of it in 2020, just as outer space reemerged as a playground for scientific discovery and displays of national power.

Will the new generation of astronomical instruments ever reach the furthest corners of the universe?

See also:

Book Photon Electron Telescope. Principles and design. ISBN 97837...

or

https://www.bod.de/buchshop/photon-electron-telescope-ilija-barukcic-9783753409139

Best

Ilija Barukcic

Dear Ilija Barukčić,

Thank you very much for your participation and valuable contribution to this discussion on new generations of astronomical instruments that allow you to look into respectively much further space objects located in relation to our Solar System and to look into more distant corners of the Universe. Thank you for providing the link to the interesting publication describing the photon electron telescope.

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz