Would Galileo suffice?

https://pds-atmospheres.nmsu.edu/cgi-bin/getdir.pl?&volume=gp_0001

Unlike Cassini or Juno it did send a probe through the atmosphere.

If you're after wind-speeds as a function of latitude and longitude, average values ought to be available from remote (rather than in-situ) sensing.

Thank you for the information James Garry ! :) Wind-speeds as a function of latitude and longitude would be preferred...

Good morning Takaya,

The nature of the jovian weather is that it has (as I'm sure you know) well-described zones - with average wind speeds that show an alternating striped pattern - so there's no longitudinal dependency as far as I know (till you get to the weirdness at the poles).

So you get patterns like figure 4 of this:

Article Comparison of the Deep Atmospheric Dynamics of Jupiter and S...

Imaging from spacecraft or terrestrial telescopes will be the best bet.

And of the sets I know of, the JIRAM imager on Juno is likely to give the finest resolution. I like the work by Dr Kaspi et al. on the zonal structure at depth on Jupiter.

So I'd reach out to them and see if they have some suitably processed datasets that wouldn't need to much finessing.

(https://www.weizmann.ac.il/EPS/kaspi/sites/EPS.kaspi/files/uploads/cv_yohai_kaspi_30092023.pdf)

Would also have suggested asking Yohai. Eli (Galanti) would be another person.