The Cost of Knowledge (http://thecostofknowledge.com/index.php) indicates, over 14,5K researchers globally reprehend the Elsevier's paywall for the publicly funded science. What is your take on it?

Also, as a researcher: 

1. How easily could you do without access to Elsevier journals via ScienceDirect and print copies?

(i) It would be no problem at all.

(ii) It would be OK, but a minor inconvenience.

(iii) It would be OK most of the time, but occasionally very inconvenient.

(iv) It would be a significant inconvenience.

(v) It would have a strongly negative impact on my research.

2. For those who negotiate on our behalf to be in a strong bargaining position, they have to be able to risk our losing access to Elsevier products (other than those that are freely available) for a significant length of time. How willing would you be for them to take that risk?

(i) Very willing.

(ii) Willing.

(iii) Unwilling.

(iv) Very unwilling.

/after https://gowers.wordpress.com/2014/04/24/elsevier-journals-some-facts/; also see http://svpow.com/2014/07/21/mike-taylors-esof2014-talk-should-science-always-be-open/ /.

http://thecostofknowledge.com/index.php

https://gowers.wordpress.com/2014/04/24/elsevier-journals-some-facts

http://svpow.com/2014/07/21/mike-taylors-esof2014-talk-should-science-always-be-open/

Similar questions and discussions