The Cost of Knowledge (http://thecostofknowledge.com/index.php) indicates, over 14,5K researchers globally reprehend the Elsevier's paywall for the publicly funded science. What is your take on it?
Also, as a researcher:
1. How easily could you do without access to Elsevier journals via ScienceDirect and print copies?
(i) It would be no problem at all.
(ii) It would be OK, but a minor inconvenience.
(iii) It would be OK most of the time, but occasionally very inconvenient.
(iv) It would be a significant inconvenience.
(v) It would have a strongly negative impact on my research.
2. For those who negotiate on our behalf to be in a strong bargaining position, they have to be able to risk our losing access to Elsevier products (other than those that are freely available) for a significant length of time. How willing would you be for them to take that risk?
(i) Very willing.
(ii) Willing.
(iii) Unwilling.
(iv) Very unwilling.
/after https://gowers.wordpress.com/2014/04/24/elsevier-journals-some-facts/; also see http://svpow.com/2014/07/21/mike-taylors-esof2014-talk-should-science-always-be-open/ /.
http://thecostofknowledge.com/index.php
https://gowers.wordpress.com/2014/04/24/elsevier-journals-some-facts
http://svpow.com/2014/07/21/mike-taylors-esof2014-talk-should-science-always-be-open/