I am looking for something called the delta delta T method, used for calculating something for absorption cooling systems. It's supposed to be a fairly popular method. I would appreciate it if someone could provide me some references on this method, or help explain what it is.
Thanks, and sorry for the vagueness.
The first article is the only one which mentions delta delta T, although the in-text citation is incorrect, and there's no corresponding reference. The patent uses another definition of delta delta T. The fifth article might be useful, but it will take some time to access it. The other three are not relevant, and I can't read German, so that article won't help. Well, thanks for pointing me in Ziegler's direction. And be careful when using Google, as it can be misleading.
Yeah, I didn't find anything useful when using Google, and you found one article that is poorly written, and a bunch of other useless stuff. That poorly written article still gave me a hint, which allowed me to find this:
https://suw.biblos.pk.edu.pl/resources/i8/i0/i2/r802/AlbersJ_ControlAbsorption.pdf
and this:
https://depositonce.tu-berlin.de/bitstream/11303/5169/1/173_k%C3%BChn_%C3%B6zg%C3%BCr-popanda_ziegler.pdf
which contain the info that I needed, and perhaps someone in the future might need as well.
Now, perhaps you could tell me what validates you and your friend's bullying? Perhaps you own the site, and get to decide what questions are appropriate? This isn't the first time you've done this, so maybe you just enjoy the view from that high horse?
Ok, in order:
"I can't see any bullying here." Your first reply to my question was purely to insult me for even asking a question. I mentioned in my reply to that that I didn't find anything after using Google. Both posts have now been deleted. Michael's reply then mentioned "All found using Google" as a "subtle" jab at my reply to your first post.
"Instead I see a low quality question" If you're so much of an expert, as to think of my question as low quality and easily answerable, then simply move along, or better yet, use that knowledge of yours to help. Instead, you chose to attack my character. Do you refuse to answer your student's questions if you consider them beneath you?
"then Michael's honest attempt to help you" Mixed in with "All found using Google", which I've mentioned above. I also thanked him for his help, and commented on articles he attached, so if anyone else comes looking for delta delta T, they won't end up wasting time reading articles that have nothing to do with it.
"Then your answer, which was completely rewritten and now contains something else than originally. (You did this without notifying the readers, and this is highly unethical.)"
I changed my answer to add the final line, and correct some spelling mistakes. Forgive my impudence, dear readers.
"Your last answer indicates a lack of gratitude and that is actually a sign of arrogance." I already thanked Michael, but I won't tolerate his bullying, and I have no reason to be thankful to you.
Also, since Rg hasn't deleted this question yet, then I guess that they don't think of it as a low quality question.
And in case someone stumbles upon this later, here are some more links to help out:
http://www.eta.tu-berlin.de/fileadmin/a33371300/Redakteurbereich/Forschung/Konferenzen/ChEM_workshop_transcript_final.pdf
http://www.eta.tu-berlin.de/fileadmin/a33371300/Redakteurbereich/Forschung/Konferenzen/ChEM_workshop_transcript_final.pdf
Gee, thanks. Might want to work on your approach, though... Still, what do I care? I got the information I needed, and I'm thankful for it.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Heat