Your welcome Karsten. I am not sure it has always been the case but recently this phenomenon has began to overtake RG and it is annoying, because in the few months I have been a member it is a very useful resource!

(Interestingly it seems to coincide with the introduction of the RG score system - not that I am insinuating in any way that various members might have become obsessed with increasing what is an unimportant score at the cost of flooding RG.)

Hi Praveen,

I, as I am sure others, will not be able to answer your question properly as it lacks sufficient information to provide you with a definitive answer.

You do not state what type of pollution you want to control, or what sort of treatment types you refer to?

Please spend a little more time and include more detail in your future questions if you want RG to prove useful.

Thanks Matthew, I absolutely agree! I noticed that this is a general phenomenon here at RG. There are tons of very specific questions whith limited information where the first answer is either very general or a question for more information.

Your welcome Karsten. I am not sure it has always been the case but recently this phenomenon has began to overtake RG and it is annoying, because in the few months I have been a member it is a very useful resource!

(Interestingly it seems to coincide with the introduction of the RG score system - not that I am insinuating in any way that various members might have become obsessed with increasing what is an unimportant score at the cost of flooding RG.)

PPL plz tell any technology like physical, chemical & electrochemical during treatment process produce secondary pollutant. I not asking this question for RG score nothing going to get with this score in my life. You people must tell "one technology for all pollution control treatment process (air , water & land pollution). This not a silly question.

What?

May I suggest Google - www.google.com

And Science Direct - www.sciencedirect.com

How can one technology tackle all pollution? Air pollution, ground pollution, water pollution (and sub types of water pollution i.e. for sea, rivers, underground water tables etc etc...) - I could go on.

(If I wanted to be pedantic I would even say you have noise pollution, light pollution etc (although this is a different area) - because the term pollution covers too general an area)

Surely there is a more specific area you are wanting to know more on? If you ware wishing to know more types of pollution and general stuff about the types of technology you should search the web, your library or even, dare I say wikipedia.

On a serious note.

Active prevention is the only single method which I can think of which would tackle ALL pollution. This can be achieved through education, raising awareness and using biodegradable and/or renewable materials and green production techniques.

It is unbelievable how some people can make so general questions without giving important information. It is really annoying!!!

What kind of pollution? Organic molecules? Inorganic compounds? Heavy metals? Radioactive materials? Or do you really thing that there is a single process that mitigates all these pollutants?

What kind of Pollution u reqd. Is it water ,air, soil. Plz make a clarity

ok wastewater which contain inorganic, orangic & even with heavy metals and low pH about 2-3 range. which method is suitable for waste water treatment. without any secondary pollutant formation during treatment process.

In many of the worlds major towns there are things called libraries. In these buildings there are shelves with books on them usually grouped into 'sections'. A 'section' is a group of books that discuss a similar topic. Any decent technical library will have a 'section' entitled 'Pollution Control' where you will find a sub section called 'Waste-water Management'. May I suggest you take a walk down to your local library, find the section of interest and have a read. If you then have any further questions about the applicability of a particular technique to the precise application you are looking for, please come back and ask us what we think...

Control the human activity wisely.

This is a kind of dilemma to answer this question. Actually, we enjoy most of new stuff discovered by our human being at a cost of "pollution". For example, solar cell is widely considered as a new green technology, which could provide electric power with less "pollution" as compared traditionally thermal power generation. However, the fabrication of high pure Si is a real serious "pollution" process. Beside the simply original ecological work of farmers, I can not figure out which industrial operation is a real "pollution"-free.

I think the best way is control education of people, since most pollution come by unenlightenment using things, machines, nature, etc.!

I would say membrane technologies, but a method without any waste generation doesn't exist when you have metals, organics and inorganics. You can see leachate treatment methods in waste landfills to get information.

Decrease the pollution comming from industry by fiters. Using more by elecrical cars and machines. Increase the solar and wind sources for energy. Icrease the forests and jungels zones in the word.