This research question seeks to understand the environmental and economic implications of two different strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving transportation sustainability in urban areas: promoting the use of electric vehicles (EVs) and investing in and improving public transportation systems.
On one hand, promoting the use of EVs can help reduce the emissions associated with traditional gasoline and diesel-powered vehicles, which are a major contributor to air pollution and climate change. Additionally, EVs can offer cost savings for drivers, as they require less maintenance and can be charged using cheaper electricity rather than expensive gasoline or diesel. However, promoting the widespread use of EVs also requires significant investment in charging infrastructure, which can be costly and may not be available in all locations. Moreover, the production and disposal of EV batteries can also have significant environmental impacts, and the electricity used to charge EVs may still come from fossil fuel sources in some regions.
On the other hand, investing in and improving public transportation systems can also help reduce greenhouse gas emissions and promote sustainable transportation in urban areas. Public transportation systems can reduce the number of cars on the road, leading to lower emissions from transportation. Moreover, public transportation can be more accessible and affordable for low-income communities, which may be less likely to own cars or have access to EV charging infrastructure. However, investing in public transportation systems also requires significant capital investment and ongoing maintenance costs. Additionally, public transportation may not be as convenient or flexible as personal vehicles, which could limit its appeal for some travelers.
Overall, this research question seeks to explore the complex trade-offs between promoting the use of EVs and investing in public transportation systems, in order to inform policy decisions that can help reduce transportation emissions and promote sustainable urban development.
The meaning of this "research question" is not understood.
The production of electric vehicles for private transport derives from speculative drives, like any activity involving the private automotive sector.
The "compromise" with public transport has something to do with "cabbage at a snack".
Cars using internal combustion engines primarily emit carbon monoxide (CO) not carbon dioxide (CO2).
The production, as well as the subsequent disposal, of batteries has a strong environmental impact throughout the entire supply chain.
To conclude, the electric car is just the fig leaf of a consumerist system whose only interest is maintaining the status quo.
Dear Dr. Memon!
I m not an expert in the field but I found a new study that takes a system view on the topic you discuss:
"Table 2. Implications of transport actions (EVs and public transport) SDGs, costs, equity and implementation"
Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11625-023-01322-3/tables/2
in: Halsnæs, K., Some, S. & Pathak, M. Beyond synergies: understanding SDG trade-offs, equity and implementation challenges of sectoral climate change mitigation options. Sustain Sci (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01322-3, Open access: Article Beyond synergies: understanding SDG trade-offs, equity and i...
Yours sincerely, Bulcsu Szekely
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Chemistry