I discovered a commonly overlooked anatomical axis that allowed a science based hypothesis.
I agree that scientific hypotheses can open up new fields of knowledge. So I think the anatomical axis you discovered should be pressed for its full implications.
FYI KIRK
Technical Report
http://www.researchgate.com
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29972.50561
The Sacral X Axes
Location, Structure, Movement, Parallel Kinetic Ligamentous Loading,
Function, Biotensegrity Technology and Pathology.
The essential pieces of the low back pain puzzle.
Richard L. DonTigny, PT
Independent researcher
81 North Shore Drive #10
Belgrade, MT 59714
406-219-3416
Based on the discovery, scientific hypothesis can be developed based on past work in related areas to inter-relate the variables giving its possible usage and thereby leading to innovation that can be commercialised.
Is it not hypothesis as a source of innovation and discovery?
If you look back at over 100 years of treating low back pain with various inappropriate hypotheses such as MacKenzie's method, the disc, stenosis, Sturesson's very accurate measurements on an inappropriate axis, Vleemings form and force closure and non-existent axes for the sacroiliac joint based only on creative rhetoric, it is a small wonder that low back pain is still the 'primary diagnosis' for this ubiquitous problem. False hypotheses are the source of much funding for research and for the development of inappropriate expensive treatments. Innovation must be science based. Any hypothesis must be science based. If you would research low back pain I would you suggest that you first look at the sacral x axes.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Econ
- Innovation Economics
- Innovation