Can such a correspondence be an indicator of the proximity of a model to a natural prototype, or vice versa, an indicator of the deep cognitive nature of the identified factors of natural abilities? While studying the factor structure of developmental disorders, we encountered some analogies, and now I find it difficult to interpret these analogies.
Not necessarily. Two completely different approaches could yield the same result.
This is a brilliant question, thank you for this cognitive formulation, that is of innate abilities as anchor, and the contrast with natural ability of human potential to sane questions that free from disequilibrium.
All machine learning or "thinking" made by human mirrors the law of logic of the maker +/- some variation within acceptable bound, beyond which we would classify as error. Artificial intelligence is a product of the natural intelligence that creates it-- - - all human artifacts reflects its creator. There is no creation that can independently develop to have its own creation. No machine can create a new generation of machines without the command, control, and creative force of its creator (human with natural intelligence). Artificial intelligence is an evidence of the power of natural intelligence.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Computer Science and Engineering
- Artificial Intelligence