I'm not a specialist in artificial intelligence, so all my comments will focus on the form and language.

• In the Abstract:

- a Image Based Visual must be an Image Based Visual

- a omnidirectional robot must be an omnidirectional robot

- a unknown environment must be an unknown environment

- environment And explore must be environment and explore

• In the Introduction:

- The reference .[1], [2] should be [1,2].

• IMPLEMENTATION AND RESULTS section has no meaning!

• The references must be in alphabetic order.

• The acknowledgement may be as follows:

The Research group would like to deeply thank ………….. for their support and for their useful and constructive comments and discussions that lead to a better presentation of the results and improve the paper.

Sorry,I am also a novice.

I have been in the field of research for about 2/3 years now. U may send a MS-word version of the paper to [email protected] so that u can track my suggestions and corrections.

I'm not a specialist in artificial intelligence, so all my comments will focus on the form and language.

• In the Abstract:

- a Image Based Visual must be an Image Based Visual

- a omnidirectional robot must be an omnidirectional robot

- a unknown environment must be an unknown environment

- environment And explore must be environment and explore

• In the Introduction:

- The reference .[1], [2] should be [1,2].

• IMPLEMENTATION AND RESULTS section has no meaning!

• The references must be in alphabetic order.

• The acknowledgement may be as follows:

The Research group would like to deeply thank ………….. for their support and for their useful and constructive comments and discussions that lead to a better presentation of the results and improve the paper.

Your paper is interesting, but it´s a bit difficult to read it due to numerous language mistakes. I would suggest to find a person that can read your article and correct all the mistakes. Maybe you can ask some of your colleagus or search the web for good freelancers (very often they provide cheap services). As to the content and structure: if this is a conference paper, then you can probably keep it as it is.

Thanks for the comments, will review some terms

Hi Jonathan,

Aún que el Inglés tampoco sea mi lengua nativa trabajo en Inglés y en particular en IA desde hace unos años podré hacer un esfuerzo para intentar ayudar-te en el Inglés. Lo mio es representación de conocimiento en Ontologias por lo que no te podré ayudar nada en lo de robotica o visión. :(

Enviame el ficheiro fuente en TeX o Word a [email protected] para que podamos hacer tracking si quieres.

Salu2

David

Yo estoy en línea con los comentarios hechos anteriormente [a excepción del que dice que las referencias deben ir en orden alfabético, pues me parece que estás utilizando la norma vancouver o algo parecido (debes chequear bien que estilo estás utilizando, el programa EndNote te ayudaría mucho con las referencias) y de acuerdo a esta norma las referencias van en orden numéríco como lo estás haciendo en tu artículo. Repto debes chequear cual es el estilo de la revista en que piensas publicarlo y de acuerdo a eso formatear la bilbiografía]. En general te sugiero que debes pedirle a un traductor anglosajón que te haga la correción de estilo. Yo por ejemplo fui críado en colegio bilngüe y hablo bien en inglés, y aparentemente escribo bien también. Pero a la hora del estilo para una publicación internacional el mismo debe ir perfecto. Y esa perfección solo te la puede dar un anglosajón culto. Una persona cuyo idioma nativo sea el inglés y que sepa algo de artículos científicos o algo así. Me imagino que en Bogotá deben haber varias personas con ese perfil, pero si no la encuentras yo tengo los datos de la traductora-correctora de estilo más famosa de Cali quien es una norte-americana. En cuanto a lo que lo sé de Inglés y aunque no me leí todo artículo, debes trabajar mejor los signos de puntuación y conectores, por ejemplo. Eso es todo lo que te puedo decir así a ojo de pájaro.

Att,

Juan-Fernando Duque-Osorio. MSc

Website: http://juanferduque.blogspot.com

Some nice links:

(1) how to write papers (although a little vague for starters): http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/simonpj/papers/giving-a-talk/writing-a-paper-slides.pdf

(2) how to give a talk, from harvard: http://isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=k1985&topicid=icb.topic650252&panel=icb.topic650252%3Arwatch%248%3Fentry%3D18850&viewParam_entry=18850

I have it already read yesterday, I will give you my review within days. I can recommend the IEEE websites. They have tools for writing papers. It will be quite a search since the website is extensive.

Don't worrry it has my attention.

I think your presentation is not clear. What is the problem in your paper? what is the solution your propose? and how is the originality about your technique. Describes clearly.

I have seen the paper, i will give u reply soon

I will go through the paper in detail and give my comments in a few days

I agree with the suggestions made above, but i only add that there is no need to place the Matlab code in your paper, it is better if you explain the results rather than put some code

I am not familiar with the tradition and culture in this field but generally speaking isn't it a bit unwise to make your unpublished draft/manuscript accessible by public?

Yes it's true it is not recommended to show your work before it is published, but anyway....

I have read your manuscript and I will give you my comment within a few days. but I think you can send it to the Journal and the selected referees will make some amendments that you should follow and by this way you will learn many things but it's not recommended to show your work before it is published..

In paper , The Title should be attractive, this one is not good.

research group in mobile robotics should be first letter capitalized form

What is "Image Based Visual Servoing" not clear

Merely from the abstract, your paper is SURE to be rejected by the editor, because this question is already solved!

Second, Labview based solution is not encouraged to be used in the paper, see more relevant papers' algorithm part, try to describe in math form.

Using existing ANN toolbox is not an good option, if without alternation or improvement.

Compared with state-of -art system, is your system outperformed or not, give data and figures to illustrate this