Since the new developmentalism encompasses so many aspects of developmental change, it is not clear which aspects are being prioritized, which previous theories contribute the most to the new approach, or how it is even possible to combine some many parameters in a workable theory? It almost sounds as if "it looks at everything important about development," and "answers all the questions that should be asked!" Even as a teen-ager, I remember hearing that "something that explains everything, explains nothing!"
William Sheridan has posed a very important question when we want to understand what is really new. As I am not in the position to answer this question, I hope some other person who are one of promoters if the New Developmentalism.
To the viewers of this page, let me add that I have posed a related question:
What is lacking in the New Developmentalism?
https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_is_lacking_in_the_New_Developmentalism?
To Willian Sheridan
It would be better that you edit the items which appear in topics. If not, your uestion will not be noticed by those who will be interested in your question. Suggested topics are
Economic Development, Developing Economies, Development Economics, International Relations, and others.
What is happening with this question page? There are evidently at least two question followers, but the statistics shows that there is only one follower.
It seems the above mentioned statistical error has been corrected.
- Badges
- Science method
- Similar topics
- Chemistry, Organic
- Synthesis