Should I submit a supplemental bibliography? I have to include these citations because of the work I am reviewing.
Dear Zohaib,
Agreeing with Ian I consider the review papers as contributions that typically have (or "must have") long references section, otherwise they do not fulfill their purpose. Furthermore, 150 references is not too many, IMHO, in a geological paper dealing with a new geodynamic model of larger area this number is often reached, even if it is not a review paper.
Kind regards, Balázs
No, the citations belong close at hand. It is annoying for the reader to have to refer to 2 documents.
Your article is expected to be mainly a big references section.
Just make sure that you do not include any reference that you do not mention in your text.
Dear Zohaib,
Agreeing with Ian I consider the review papers as contributions that typically have (or "must have") long references section, otherwise they do not fulfill their purpose. Furthermore, 150 references is not too many, IMHO, in a geological paper dealing with a new geodynamic model of larger area this number is often reached, even if it is not a review paper.
Kind regards, Balázs
Journal of Advances in Internal Medicine:
– Maximum number of references for Review Article – 150
http://www.aimjournal.org
Journal of Women's Health:
– The maximum number of references may not exceed 100.
http://www.liebertpub.com/manuscript/journal-of-womens-health/42/
JAMA – The Journal of the American Medical Association:
– No more than 50-75 references.
https://jama.jamanetwork.com/public/instructionsForAuthors.aspx
Thankyou Ian, Balázs and Nebi for answering, these are exactly my views, I want to refer to the publications included in my review within the articles references section, but i think most journals in public health or epidemiology have a reference limit much smaller than that, anyways i will try my luck and see if i can succeed in it, thanks again though.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Education
- Higher Education
- Academic Writing