This is not directly a science question, but it's relevant to anyone who publishes scientific articles and wants to give proper credit to the researchers who are doing valuable and useful work.
I figured that it is a common problem (google it to see...) that BibTeX does not process the new (9-digit) arXiv numbers correctly. Instead, they are truncated 4 digits after the dot, which means that references are often not displayed correctly and in particular they are often not captured by the corresponding databases - thus effectively denying citations to some authors to whom I have put in a reference.
Does anybody know a fix to this problem? I know it's not directly a science question, but it's certainly important for proper scientific work.
It would be good to know indeed, but I was not able to find an answer, even though the very same question was asked elsewhere too.
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/239860/bibtex-truncates-arxiv-numbers
Hi Alexander,
I made some inquiry and got the answer hereunder from Martin Sievers. It might be that you just have to tell him what BibTeX style you are using. He would then have a look at that style and see what he can do (Did you already have contact with him in the past ?).
Maybe this helps !
Regards
Guibert
_______________________________
Answer from Martin Sievers :
"Hello,
I am not a member of CTAN, but I may answer your request:
I am afraid, CTAN (and especially the webmaster) is not the right person
to ask a question regarding the usage of a package. CTAN does manage all
package uploads, but does not alter contents or develop packages itself.
When looking at your description above I can only quote David Carlisle:
> bibtex itself knows nothing at all about arXiv (or links). If there
> is an error in the bibtex style you are using it would help if you
> said what style that is (and include it here if it is a non-standard
> one).
Unfortunately the thread opener hasn't answered that simple question.
What BibTeX style are _you_ using? I would have a look at that style and
see what I can do.
Best regards
Martin
--
Diplom-Mathematiker Martin Sievers
Kompetenzzentrum für elektronische Erschließungs- und
Publikationsverfahren in den Geisteswissenschaften
(Trier Center for Digital Humanities)
Universität Trier
54286 Trier
Besucheranschrift:
Universität Trier
Universitätsring 15
DM-Gebäude
54296 Trier
Aktuelle Projekte: Fontentwicklung / XML-Druckaufbereitung / Einsatz von TeX
Ehemalige Projekte: XML-Print / Workspace for Collaborative Editing
Raum: DM333 (3.OG B)
Telefon: 0651 201-3017
Telefax: 0651 201-3589
Skype: martinsievers
E-Mail: [email protected]
Internet:
http://kompetenzzentrum.uni-trier.de/de/ueber-uns/mitarbeiter/martin-sievers/
"
David Carlisle is with TEX related issues at Stackexchange (but it seems "currently somewhat inactive in the LaTeX project"): see enclosed link !
http://tex.stackexchange.com/users/1090/david-carlisle
I also had following reaction from Leslie Lamport one of the two creators of TeX : "I am no longer involved with maintaining LaTeX or related programs. Please contact the TeX User’s Group."
The TeX User's Group is here :
https://tug.org/
There it is written :
"If you're looking for help, you can get community support via a public mailing list (texhax), forum (latex-community.org), q&a site (tex.stackexchange.com), or in other ways."
https://tug.org/
Dear Guibert,
thanks a lot for your advice. I have been able to resolve the problem by downloding the newest JHEP/JCAP style file. However, indeed, the BibTeX style used has to exlicitly provide for longer arXiv numbers, so that one can try to find the decisive command line in the guts of the style file and add a prescrition by hand.
Anyway, thanks again!
Alexander
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Citations