How should ChatGPT and other similar intelligent chatbots be improved so that they do not generate plagiarism of other publications that their authors have previously posted online?
This issue is particularly important, because it happens that the data entered into ChatGPT, the information contained in the texts entered for the purpose of automated rewriting, remains in the database that this chatbot uses in the situation of generating answers to questions asked by subsequent Internet users. The problem has become serious, as there have already been situations where sensitive data on specific individuals, institutions and business entities has been leaked in this way. On the other hand, many institutions and companies use ChatGPT in the preparation of reports, editing of certain documents. Also, pupils and students use ChatGPT and other similar intelligent chatbots to generate texts that act as credit papers and/or from which they then compose their theses. On the other hand, functions have been added to some existing anti-plagiarism applications to detect the fact that ChatGPT is being used in the course of students' writing credit papers and theses. In addition to this, the problem is also normative in nature, as it is necessary to adapt the legal norms of copyright law to the dynamic technological advances taking place in the development and application of generative artificial intelligence technology, so that the provisions of this law are not violated by users using ChatGPT or other similar intelligent chatbots. Among the important issues that could significantly reduce the scale of this problem would be the introduction of a mandatory requirement to mark all works, including texts, graphics, photos, videos, etc., that have been created with the help of the said intelligent chatbots, that they have been so created. On the other hand, it is necessary for the AI-equipped chatbots to be improved by their creators, by the technology companies developing these tools, in order to eliminate the possibility of ChatGPT "publishing" confidential, sensitive information from institutions and companies in response to questions, commands, tasks of developing a certain type of text by subsequent Internet users. In addition, the said intelligent chatbots should be improved in such a way that if in the course of automated text generation, including inspiration from other source texts, "quoting" whole sentences, substantial fragments of them, substantive content of other publications but without fully showing the sources, i.e. without a full bibliographic description of all the source publications that the chatbot generating subsequent texts used. In addition, the user of the aforementioned intelligent chatbots does not know to what extent the text they created with the help of these tools is plagiarized from other texts previously entered into them or from publications published on the Internet, including documents of companies and institutions, theses, scientific publications, industry articles, journalistic articles, etc.
I described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology in my article below:
OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND THE NEED FOR NORMATIVE REGULATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT
Article OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL I...
In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:
How should ChatGPT and other similar intelligent chatbots be improved so that they do not generate plagiarism of other publications that their authors have previously posted on the Internet?
How should ChatGPT be improved so that it does not generate plagiarism of other publications that their authors have previously posted on the Internet?
And what is your opinion about it?
What is your opinion on this issue?
Please answer,
I invite everyone to join the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Best wishes,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research.
In writing this text I did not use other sources or automatic text generation systems.
Copyright by Dariusz Prokopowicz
I am not sure what you mean by plagiarism in this context. I have not heard of ChatGPT lifting direct quotations from previous work.
I recommend AnswerThis, an AI research tool to facilitate the writing. https://answerthis.io/signup.
Hello, again, Dr Dariusz Prokopowicz
I think what you meant, which was not clear to others, is how to reduce plagiarism. I think the makers are the only ones who can change the algorithm(s) but whether they do it or not, I think the users have to be wise and check everything carefully given to them before submitting it to a journal or putting it onto a website.
I think the user will be responsible, such as if a defamation case arises. This happened to somebody else - they talked about it on another post in RG, I think.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Filing