We live in an age when we are drowning in papers that add (infinitesimally) to our knowledge but without bringing us any nearer to wisdom.
When I was a young researcher, a colleague and I published three papers on smoking and cardiac disease. Our professor, a wise clinician, said to us there are already too many papers on smoking. Publishing more and more papers postpones the day when we tackle the problem.
He made a deal with us. He would never publish a paper on smoking and heart disease again if we agreed to to likewise. And all three of us kept our word
We live in an age when we are drowning in papers that add (infinitesimally) to our knowledge but without bringing us any nearer to wisdom.
When I was a young researcher, a colleague and I published three papers on smoking and cardiac disease. Our professor, a wise clinician, said to us there are already too many papers on smoking. Publishing more and more papers postpones the day when we tackle the problem.
He made a deal with us. He would never publish a paper on smoking and heart disease again if we agreed to to likewise. And all three of us kept our word
Sherief Hashima , We have to think about the total time in days or months required to finish a research project. Paper publication is a by-product of a research project; there may be more than one papers out of a project.
I would add another point to Terans Gunawardhana 's.
The participants who take part in our studies are giving their work for nothing. They are not giving it to us to further our careers. They are giving their time and effort to benefit others. We have an ethical responsibility to publish the new understandings that we arrive at through using their data, but to publish them in such a way that they will bring about change for the better.
Ronán Michael Conroy you are correct, totally! Many of so-called researchers do not understand the real need of doing a research. Finally, no body is benefited.