I think the problem has more to do with the complexity of financial activity. It's not clear-cut, and so many factors (including systemic factors beyond an individual's control) affect individual outcomes. So, the "same" financial activity can cause different outcomes for different individuals. There's also the reality that (not limited to financial education) that people do not retain what is "taught", and the fact people don't always do what they know to be the "right" activity - often for legitimate reasons.
Yes, I know that I don't always practice what I know to be right, especially when it comes to shopping. I think that females may be more vulnerable in this regard.
Not really Debra - shopping is not the problem, and men have their own shopping problems that are just not represented in the zeitgeist of stereotypes. In fact, at least in Canada, women on average have FAR better financial outcomes than men. It's more about systemic issues. Look at this:
Financial education is not just about explaining market mechanisms and instruments.As it has also to do with the need for self-imposed debiasing investment rules, the correlation with behavioral finance is very strong.
As per my understanding, financial education is a systematic process of acquiring knowledge related to finance. Whereas, financial literacy is outcome of financial education process which help in making appropriate financial decisions that help to improve the well being of the individuals. Kind comments are requested, please.
What is difference between financial education and financial literacy? - ResearchGate. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/post/what_is_difference_between_financial_education_and_financial_literacy [accessed May 1, 2016].
Knowledge is a necessary but not sufficient condition. As I said, in order to avoid big mistakes you also need to get rid of cognitive/emotional distortions.