Today I came up with a document that used the term satellite-based earth observation (SBEO). I find the term is highly redundant, because in my mind, Earth Observation (EO) is the subset of remote sensing that is done from space. Then I read this in the Wikipedia article on EO:
"The term Earth observation is used in two ways, leading to confusion. In Europe, in particular, it has often been used to refer to satellite-based remote sensing, but the term is also used to refer to any form of observations of the Earth system, including in situ and airborne observations, for example. The Group on Earth Observations, which has over 100 member countries and over 100 participating organizations, uses EO in this broader sense.
To add to the confusion, in the US, for example, the term remote sensing is often used to refer to satellite-based remote sensing, but sometimes used more broadly for observations using any form of remote sensing technology, including airborne sensors and even ground-based sensors such as cameras. Perhaps the least ambiguous term to use for satellite-based sensors is satellite remote sensing, or SRS, an acronym which is gradually starting to appear in the literature."
Have you ever used the term SRS, and do you think SRS should be favored over EO, or what else can be done to reduce confusion?
NB. I use 'spaceborne' instead of 'satellite' for the 1st 'S' in SRS because the International Space Station (ISS) is used as remote sensing platform and most people would not consider the ISS a 'satellite'.