Doesn't the Artificial Intelligence field need TO WORK-IN developmental processes (ontogeny) IN THE true-intelligence emulators to understand and track the changing and hierarchical nature of "LEARNINGS"? (These are also cumulative processes: where older behaviors, "lower in the hierarchy" are still functional, as needed.)
Seems like a huge oversight. (Of course, to do this understanding the corresponding processes in the human is needed; STILL, IT IS AN OVERSIGHT !)
My guidance (and potential contribution) HERE comes from: "A Human Ethogram ..." which, because it outlines a completely empirical approach to discovering the aspects of human cognitive development, is amenable to AI. PLUS (and this is a big plus): all the hypotheses that stem from this view are NOW (thanks to eye-tracking technology, etc.) testable and verifiable. AS FOUND, they may be emulated -- nothing of their nature would prohibit that (this is what you get with being entirely empirical and empirically based).
See: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286920820_A_Human_Ethogram_Its_Scientific_Acceptability_and_Importance_now_NEW_because_new_technology_allows_investigation_of_the_hypotheses
Article A Human Ethogram: Its Scientific Acceptability and Importanc...
P.S. The Ethogram perspective (noted, above) is truly autonomous-ness (autonomy) INCARNATE -- and unique in this way. The perspective also FIXES Perceptual Control Theory (another approach OFTEN offered expressly to AI people -- but PCT is self-contradictory UNTIL FIXED): SEE my Comment UNDER Rupert Young's Update, under https://www.researchgate.net/project/Perceptual-Control-Theory-PCT
And then, I offer a lot of the rest of the understanding of human behavior (the open systems, but "gate-keepers" : the memory capacities/systems) under my Project: https://www.researchgate.net/project/Developing-a-Usable-Empirically-Based-Outline-of-Human-Behavior-for-FULL-Artificial-Intelligence-and-for-Psychology
I do believe this is the basic "kit" for true artificial intelligence and also for a good and progressive understanding of human behavior patterns.
I might say (with regard/respect to the above citations): "It is good to have the '2 ends' and to have one with fixed aspects and the other in a significant sense "open" and then to allow good research to 'fill in' 'the middle'."
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Computer Science and Engineering
- Artificial Intelligence