Dear colleagues, we (with my collaborators) develop an interesting multi-wallet carbon based nanosensors for for amplification-free DNA detection. According to literature this kind of sensors is non very popular but there are enought evidence of their potential in molecular diagnostics. May be anybody use (used) nanosensor in their work? Could you give me feedback? We would like to improve and adopt our sensors for clinical diagnostics.
Now we able to recognize SNP's and specific viral/bactrerial NA in samples after routine column-based NA purification. We do not use any amplification. The detection is non-fluorescent.
Dear Ali mohamed rashed thank you for your interest. May be you know people who already use nanosenosr in biomedical science?
Dear Andrei
In best of my knowledge it's really better for your team to start comparative study of your sensor with others are using in Food safe grade to show benefits and advantages of your sensor.
I think it's easiest and the best step to start.
Then step by step take more challenging issues because even in clinical sensors are not welcome yet.
According to math, physics and chemistry sensors are sensors like photons detectors but you can see easily even we don't believe nonodrop for example.
So you have a long way to go.
With best wishes.
Alireza
- Badges
- Science topic