ChatGPT is an AI chatbot system that OpenAI released in November to show off and test what a very large, powerful AI system can accomplish. You can ask it countless questions and often will get an answer that's useful.
Yes I will use it is very useful and excellent application. But in chat gpt some issues are there like asking links of any web page or videos means it is giving no available content in that link.
Eighty percent of respondents have used AI chatbots — and 57% say they use it for ‘creative fun’...
The key, many agreed, is to see AI as tool to help with work, rather than to replace work altogether. AI can be a useful tool. However, it has to remain one of the tools. Its limitations and defects have always to be clearly kept in mind and governed...
Yes, I did many experiences with ChatGPT in different areas. The experiences are very interesting.
1. Its knowledge is huge and it can combine the knowledge from different sources quite well.
2. It can design problem solving architecture, simple programs, can suggest multiple ways to solve the problems.
3. If I ask to optimize or do some modifications, many times it will be good.
4. Many times it is using the common sense very well, however, sometimes it forgets something important. E.g. I asked to write a simple program, then I asked some modifications and it was done with success, then again some modifications, and it forget the previous modification, although when I told this, then it was successful to put it back.
5. A very interesting conversation happened when I asked it to give a good example to explain the transitivity to a pupil. The explanation used dogs of different sizes. I quote: "If you say that the Great Dane is taller than the Chihuahua, and the Chihuahua is taller than the Labrador Retriever, then you can say that the Great Dane is also taller than the Labrador Retriever."
When I asked back it knew that the Chihuahua should be the smallest.
Greedily I subscribed to ChatGPT Plus as soon as it was available in Germany. It is worth every cent. One must take into account on what areas ChatGPT excels. My occupation is software developer and as such I used to spend many hours searching for resources in the internet. ChatGPT is an expert in the areas of formal and natural languages. What you shouldn't expect is ChatGPT to write complete software programs. Rather, it is like a patient personal tutor whom you can ask for code snippets to incrementally collect the needed buildings blocks.
Interesting statement. I made the opposite observation. The makers of ChatGPT fed the system with Stackoverflow, so it has deep insight into software related stuff. However, I wanted to ChatGPT to display the structure formulas of some sugars. I started asking for a benzene ring. As a result it showed in ASCII art a linear molecule with three carbon atoms, the inner of which had five binding arms. Maybe they'll fix it some time. ChatGPT is a tool, and those who carve wood in place of a carpenter often injure their hands.
I increasingly use chat GPT as a guide for solving problems using different applications and languages, such as SQL or python. When I had a task, I usually used pen and paper to draw some steps necessary to complete this task. Now I use chatGPT, which creates these steps for me and serve as guidance. Even more, if I have doubts about actions or progress, I can continue to "discuss" newly arisen issues. I use it in two ways: one is to speed up the process of preparation, and the second is to get a set of instructions that I don't know and have no experience with.
ChatGPT might not yet give us sparkling prose. But it can free scientists up to focus on more-stimulating writing tasks...
Many of us have already been trying ChatGPT. If you’ve checked science social media recently, it’s likely that you’ve already seen many of its writings. In common with many other researchers, I worry about artificial intelligence (AI) replacing me. I’m a vaccine researcher and spend much of my time writing grant applications, papers and articles about science careers, so I set the chatbot the task of writing an opinion piece about the use of AI in grant writing...
I have experienced using it and some thing cool,exciting and promising good for the future of Artificial intelligence even if it needs more work to make the model efficient.
Hay que tener en cuenta que a pesar de que ChatGPT es reciente, el campo es muy amplio, Como investigador y docente universitario, se abre un abanico de posibilidades de apoyo de esta herramienta. Creo que revolucionará la educación, este año voy a ejecutar un proyecto con estudiantes de ingeniería de sistemas. saludos. hasta el momento las pruebas realizadas son muy alentadoras...saludos
About ten popular terms from the LIS field were put on Chat GPT (https://chat.openai.com/) to generate contents. Those contents were checked through Turnitin software (a web-based plagiarism detection service) to see the percentage of similarity. The study observed that, after checking the content with the plagiarism tool, only 13 percent similarity was found from these ten contents. The observation is significant in the context of academic integrity. The findings are perhaps useful for library information science professionals in any academic institution to generate contents...
Preprint OpenAI ChatGPT Generated Content and Similarity Index: A stu...
Dear Agim Mamuti , this is fine use of GPT chatbot in political philosophy.
Political Philosophy and ChatGPT
This study asked ChatGPT to compile a list of books a student should read as part of a PhD program in political philosophy. Four different lists were compiled. Each list included some classics in political philosophy as well as some books of questionable merit. There were a few glaring omissions...
Until now, chatbots have mostly been OK: able to handle pretty narrow Q&As but unable to manage complex questions...
Well, if you recall, one big issue with AI is hallucinations: very plausible-sounding answers that are, in fact, garbage. Unlike the nonsense answers from the lunatic personality, it’s not clear that these made-up answers are wrong. Like a convincing human BS artist, the Ai can give you eloquent, convincing, detailed, and absolutely wrong answers...
Not what you want from a technical knowledge base.
This is why ‘I don’t know’ is a great response: instead of making something up, the chatbot tells you it can’t answer your question from its knowledge base. You don’t get a fabricated answer.
You can also program the chatbot to go to ChatGTP or some other general model to get an answer. So when my chatbot returns, ‘I don’t know’, instead of saying that to the user, it will say something like, ‘Unfortunately, I don’t have an answer to that question in my knowledgebase, but I’ll ask my cousin ChatGTP.’...