I am doing land use change detection based on landsat 5, 7 and 8 images. At the pre-processing step I have done radiometric calibration and also used dark-object subtraction technique for all scenes. The changes of the three time points based on landsat 7 offer reasonable trend as desired (forest decline). But the result of the landsat 8 image shows a sudden increase of forest area, whereas the results of landsat 5 show the minimum amount of forest area. I do not know what is wrong! Should I have considered something special when comparing images from these different satellites?

Similar questions and discussions