Dear Dariusz Prokopowicz , I find this fine article belong to your new question.

Decoding the business of brain–computer interfaces

Brain–computer interfaces could one day allow people with severe paralysis to control robotic arms or generate synthetic speech solely by thinking. One of the major stumbling blocks for the technology is detecting brain activity — it looks as if this can’t be done at high-enough resolution with electrodes on the scalp. Electrodes implanted right into the brain can pinpoint activity to a few dozen neurons, but that comes with safety concerns. Last year, those concerns led the US Food and Drug Administration to reject a human-trials application from Elon Musk’s company Neuralink...

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41928-023-00929-9.epdf?sharing_token=RAfIMtQX1vmQEf0V_kQtA9RgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0OjjemHp2cjxbuZxbqxJrenrHeQfJYBI_OKgFHm74X0eoRy8unmV31MJQGgATNBPjeb2ef0szcpHMXnp0EthzaEWzQTObQGNgPDcZVt6HmbfWv9T6Lq7CRmD7WizrECBAY%3D

This will depend on the quality with which the objects and tasks in the management model are described. The lower the quality of the description the more dangerous and vice versa the higher the quality the safer.

Let's compare two descriptions of chalk

First.

• is white in colour, sometimes coloured with impurities in different shades
• brittle - easy to trace with a simple pencil
• light - density varies from 1440 kg/m 3 in a lumpy variety to 1120 kg/m 3 in a powder
• Water-insoluble and weathering-resistant (forms the massive Etreta cliffs of the English Channel)
• malleable when wet.

Second

• White
• Brittle
• Water-insoluble

Under the second description I can already think of Talc, Polyvinyl chloride

On one hand, some argue that AI-powered robots can become uncontrollable and pose a significant threat to humanity. This could happen if the AI system malfunctions, is hacked by malicious actors, or is programmed to act against human interests. Additionally, as AI systems become more advanced, they may develop their own goals and values that may conflict with human interests, leading to unintended consequences.

On the other hand, proponents of AI argue that the technology can be designed and developed in a way that is safe and beneficial to humans. For instance, AI systems can be programmed with ethical principles and values to ensure that they behave in a way that aligns with human interests. Additionally, AI systems can be designed with fail-safe mechanisms and security protocols to prevent them from being hacked or causing harm.

In summary, the potential threat posed by AI-powered robots is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires further research and debate. While there are valid concerns about the technology, there are also potential benefits that could be achieved if the technology is developed and deployed in a responsible and safe manner.

Dear Dariusz Prokopowicz , human resistance to new technologies is well known.

We’re on a Tech Futures voyage driven by COVID and AI, which will unleash a lot more tech. And, it’ll be a bumpy ride. People won’t like it and don’t want it...

A new tech resistance is forming. Neo-Luddites are challenging the deployment of robotic, AI, and frankly all tech. The original Luddites were English textile workers in the early 19th century that objected to the introduction of the mechanical automation of textile weaving, power looms, and spinning frames...

The history of tech follows reaction patterns such as resistance to the adoption of new ideas. Neo-Luddites are the metaphor of the resistance to tech disruption, AI, and innovation because of perceived mass disruption, elimination of jobs, and displacement of workers...

https://insights.cermacademy.com/412-rise-of-the-neo-luddites-greg-hutchins/

The next 100 years will also see changes and advances due to computers and artificial intelligence (AI).  Some of these may not be beneficial such as computers displacing human workers in fields such as automobile and home construction.   Other changes may benefit human life and safety such as the increasing sophistication of robotic surgery.  But unfortunately new kinds of computer and AI driven crime will occur, and future wars will probably use computerized weapons systems under AI control...

https://insights.cermacademy.com/413-history-of-computers-and-ai-capers-jones/

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) and the rise of ChatGPT and similar language models has raised concerns about the future of jobs. Many worry that these intelligent machines will replace human workers, leading to widespread unemployment and economic disruption. However, as an AI expert, I hold a different perspective. In this article, we will discuss several ways ChatGPT and AI can enhance job opportunities and contribute to a more productive and fulfilling future for humanity...

https://www.smartindustry.com/artificial-intelligence/article/33007210/a-different-perspective-on-ai-and-job-security?utm_source=SIND+Update&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=CPS230629148&o_eid=8360I8613690H9M&rdx.ident[pull]=omeda|8360I8613690H9M&oly_enc_id=8360I8613690H9M

AI finally beats humans at a real-life sport — drone racing

The new system combines simulation with onboard sensing and computation...

For the first time an AI pilot has beaten champion-level humans at drone racing.

Until now, the lighting reflexes, quick decision-making and complex planning required to race around a track at the standard of elite human racers has proved insurmountable for artificial intelligences.

But this new system, called Swift, combines the simulation training that has allowed other AIs to triumph at chess, or video games, with onboard sensors and computation to outrace its human opponents in the real world...

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02719-x

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06419-4

How robots can learn to follow a moral code

Ethical artificial intelligence aims to impart human values on machine-learning systems...

Ethical AI could even lead to insights about why humans make the moral choices they do, “to help humans be better at being human”, says computer scientist Oren Etzioni...

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03258-1

"As brain-computer interface technology advances at a dizzying clip, the possibility that machines might someday read people’s minds, alter human identities, or hinder free will have begun to seem less remote. The international neuro-rights movement is trying to build a legal framework against misuse...

But in opening the door to the brain, scientists have also unleashed a torrent of novel ethical concerns, raising fundamental questions about humanity and, crucially, where it may be heading. How society chooses to address the ethical implications of neurotechnology today, scientists like Yuste argue, will have profound impacts on the world of tomorrow. “There’s a new technology that’s emerging that could be transformational,” he said. “In fact, it could lead to the change of the human species.”..."

https://undark.org/2024/01/03/brain-computer-neurorights/