Hi everyone ,
The journal 'Plant Science'' asks me to suggest potential reviewers for the submission of my research paper and provide the specific reasons for my suggestion in the comments box for each person.
Please help me convince the editorial board to express the interest of my work which revolves around the implementation of a measurement method to remotely predict the phenological stages of species of economic interest.
It should be noted that the editor may not use your suggestions, but your help is appreciated and can speed up the selection of appropriate reviewers. Won't I risk putting the title and summary of my work on site?
Sincerely.
Firstly, it's great that Plant Science has invited you to suggest potential reviewers for your submission, as this is an opportunity to ensure that experts in your field are reviewing your work and can provide constructive feedback. To suggest potential reviewers, here are some steps that can help convince the editorial board to express interest in your work:
Identify experts in your field: Make a list of researchers whose work is relevant to your own and who have published on similar topics.
Determine their suitability as reviewers: Check their recent publications and academic positions to ensure that they have the relevant expertise and can provide an informed opinion.
Craft a persuasive argument: In the comments box for each person, provide a clear and concise summary of your work and explain how it fits with the reviewer's expertise. Also, highlight the significance of your research and how it contributes to the field.
Avoid revealing confidential information: You don't need to reveal the title or summary of your work to suggest potential reviewers. You can instead provide a general description of your work and explain why the potential reviewer would be a good fit.
By following these steps, you can help ensure that the appropriate reviewers are selected for your work, and demonstrate the significance of your research to the editorial board. Additionally, it's important to keep in mind that your suggested reviewers may not be selected, as the final decision rests with the editor.