Recently I’m working on link scheduling in Time Slotted Channel Hopping mode in IEEE802.15.4e, it’s kind of deterministic network other than CSMA that has contention in wireless sensor network(WSN).
Although contention or hidden terminal doesn’t exist in such deterministic, transmission still exist due to other reason like channel fading, so retransmission scheme is needed for reliability. And i want to find better scheme other than simple instant retransmission(when retransmission fails, the receiver reply negative ACK to sender, and the sender retransmit in the following time slot).
But I have not find any helpful paper with term ‘retransmission deterministic network’ or ‘reliability deterministic network’. Could anybody help me?
I think including "deterministic network" in your search criteria is your problem. You want to investigate use of ARQ protocols over a frequency-hopping network. These two articles seem to be what you want. Since Salvatore Morgera is listed as one of the two authors in both of them, and both are dated October 1994, chances are the articles cover similar material.
The one from Researchgate needs to be requested. The one from IEEE Xplore requires access to Xplore. This is the abstract:
"Abstract- The throughput efficiency and probability of undetected error of automatic-repeat-request (ARQ) protocols employing slow frequency hopping over Gilbert-Elliott fading channels are investigated. Throughput efficiency formulas for the three basic ARQ schemes, “stop-and-wait” (SW), “go-back-”’ (GBN), and “selective-repeat” (SR), are obtained, and the improvement in throughput efficiency due to slow frequency hopping is examined. Results are also presented on the problem of determining the number of carriers used for frequency hopping so as to minimize the effect of fading channel memory and, therefore, optimize system performance. This work has application to TDMA architectures and packet data services for third generation wireless networks, where projected data service requirements call for error rates on the order of 10-9, and the multiple service, multiple access environment demands that the delay for any service be minimized."
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=329342
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/3233439_Frequency-Hopped_ARQ_for_Wireless_Network_Data_Services
And maybe more recently, the scheme seems to have become a standard applicable to wireless sensor networks. Take a look at this:
http://www.isa100wci.org/Documents/PDF/The-Technology-Behind-ISA100-11a-v-3_pptx.aspx
Best of luck.
Article Frequency-Hopped ARQ for Wireless Network Data Services
On this same subject, if you're concentrating only on sensor networks, in which each sensor transmits periodically (not on demand), then one possible strategy is to not bother with any ARQ at all. The presumption being that the state of whatever is being sensed changes much more slowly than the rate of the periodic transmissions.
For sensor networks, this is often the case. So, go ahead and stay on the periodic transmission schedule. If the receiver missed a few updates due to signal fade, soon enough one of the scheduled transmissions will succeed. If sensors transmit sequence numbers, the receiver will know how many updates it missed (assuming the receiver cares). Regardless of sequence numbers, receivers can alert a user if x amount of time transpired since the last successful update.
Such schemes can be every bit as reliable as using ARQ, assuming again that the sensed state changes much more slowly than the sensor's update rate.
- Badges
- Science topic